Stanbic Bank Kenya Chief Executive, Charles Mudiwa has tolerated fraud at the money-laundering bank.

Four staffers of Stanbic Bank have been suspended over a signature scandal that they bank doesn’t want the public to know about, we can confirm.

The scandal involved forging signatures of dead people and withdrawing money before being approved by the management , a serious worrying trend that has been happening at the bank.

Cnyakundi.com can confirm that the staffers suspended are from the Stanbic bank Kenyatta Avenue.

The scandal involved the four mid-level staffers changing signatures in colluding with one middle-level manager in a well coordinated fraud.

We have reports that more than Ksh. 100 million has already been syphoned from accounts of dead people since last year October.

We can also confirm that the suspension of the mid-level staffers is aimed at silencing those that may try to give out further information since the fraud is well know by the senior level management who have been working day and night to hide the matter from the parent bank.

Cnyakundi.com will in a few days publish the names of the suspended staffers that were nabbed after the foiled Ksh. 8 Million scam.

[ad_1] By AFP More by this Author A Cypriot court on Tuesday handed a British teenager a four-month suspended prison sentence after convicting her of falsely accusing a dozen Israeli tourists of gang rape. The 19-year-old, who could have faced up to a year in jail, smiled and hugged family at the end of a trial that sparked protests in Britain and calls for tourists to boycott the island. Lawyers for the woman say the case was littered with investigatory and legal mistakes and issues, including repeated refusals by the judge to consider whether she was raped. The sentencing took place to loud shouts from protesters outside the court room, including dozens of Israelis -- mainly women, but some men -- who travelled to Cyprus to offer moral support to the teenager. As the judge delivered his sentencing, shouts of "Cyprus justice, shame on you" were audible in the court, despite police ordering journalists to close windows and blinds. Other shouts from outside included "Judge, shame on you, don't you have a daughter too?" and "Blaming the victim is a second rape!" Advertisement Lawyers for the woman, whom AFP is not naming, say she was raped in the seaside resort of Ayia Napa by 12 Israeli teenagers in their hotel room on July 17. She fled in distress to her own hotel and was examined by an in-house doctor, who called the police. A group of Israeli teenagers were arrested and appeared in court, but 10 days after making a complaint of rape she was interviewed again by police and signed a retraction. The Israelis, aged 15 to 18, were released without charge, allowed to return home and not called as witnesses. Britain's Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has said he has "firmly and categorically registered" concerns with Cypriot officials about the case. Judge Michalis Papathanasiou had told the young woman "statements you have given were false", as he convicted her on December 30 of "public mischief". He said during the trial that her account was beset by "contradictions, confusion, lack of logic and exaggeration". Lewis Power, a British lawyer who is part of the woman's legal team, said she would leave Cyprus by the end of the day. An appeal to the Supreme Court "will begin in the next few days", but it is not clear when any case will be heard, because the "wheels of justice move very slowly in Cyprus," he said. The case has highlighted "a gaping chasm in the treatment" of victims of sexual assault in Cyprus relative to other jurisdictions, Power added. The convicted British woman's mother and legal team say she has been suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The teenager's legal team say she was questioned by police in the absence of a translator or lawyer acting on her behalf and there was no transcript or video recording of the process. More than 50 Israelis flew to Cyprus to stand by the woman at the sentencing, partly out of disgust that the boys were welcomed home as heroes, they said. "I am happy that she is going home, but her conviction still stands," said Namaa Morell, a 20-year old mother. "I see it as a success for today, but it doesn't change the conviction and that's the main problem," especially since at least one of the boys is seeking to sue the British woman, she added. window.fbAsyncInit=function(){FB.init({appId:'174023979648743',xfbml:!0,version:'v2.5'})};(function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(d.getElementById(id)){return}js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs)}(document,'script','facebook-jssdk'));

[ad_2] Source link

[ad_1] Mr. Justice William Ouko – President Court of Appeal. The judiciary has suspended all the court of appeal sittings outside Nairobi. This means that all court of appeal proceedings in the Malindi, Nyeri and Kisumu courts of appeal have been postponed from January 13, 2020 until a shortage of judges at the Appellate court has been addressed.

The judges stationed at Mombasa and Kisumu will relocate to Nairobi with effect from that date. The other affected court station i.e. Nyeri will be served from Nairobi albeit circuit sessions will be conducted once a month to each station. To note is that the Nyeri Court of Appeal had previously been suspended for similar reasons.

Hon Justice Mr. William Ouko has attributed this shortage to retirement of judges, appointment of judges to other officers, decentralization of the appeal court and the recent death of Prof Justice Otieno Odek. In April 2018, Justice William Ouko stated that the exit of AG Paul Kihara, CJ David Maraga and DCJ Philomena Mwilu as court of appeal judges left a huge gap as their positions were yet to be filled.

“With passage of time, the Court of Appeal judges number has shrunk from 27 to 15 today following retirement of several Judges, appointment of others to (other) higher Government offices, and this week, the sudden death of Justice Odek,” read the statement.

Justice Ouko further stated that with three judges occupied somewhere else, they only remain with 12 judges creating a huge backlog of cases that await determination.

“The 15 Judges include the President of the Court, the Court’s Representative to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and the Director of the Judiciary Training Institute (JTI). In effect therefore, the country has only 12 Judges in the Court of Appeal who sit full-time.”

Late this year the Judicial Service Commission forwarded appellate judges nominees to President Uhuru Kenyatta. However, through the office of the Head of Public Service, the president revealed that some of the nominees had integrity concerns hence why they he had declined to appoint the judges.

These judges were Msagha Mbogholi, Aggrey Muchelule, Francis Tuiyot, Hellen Omondi, Pauline Nyamweya, Weldon Korir, Jessie Wanjiku Lesiit, Mumbi Ngugi, George Odunga and Joel Ngugi.

Last week 5 appellate court judges were given state commendations. Hon Justce Githinji Erastus was awarded the Chief of order of the burning spear (CBS) whereas Justice Makhandia, Justice Musinga D. Kilo, Justice Kairu, Lady Justices Agnes Murgor and Lady Justice Jamila Wambui were awarded the Elder of order of burning spear (EBS).

On Friday December 20, 2019 the Court of Appeal upheld High Court judge Mumbi Ngugi’s ruling on suspension of governors facing graft charges. Lady Justice Jamila Mohammed read the judgement on behalf of Judges David Musinga, Steven Gatembu and Agnes Murgor. Mahakamani News is Kenya’s top court reporting and crime coverage website. If you have a case that needs coverage, or if you are facing injustice from powerful forces, fired unfairly or reporting any corruption or relevant news pertaining judiciary etc please contact us via cases@mahakamani.news Comments comments (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&appId=1777497562299453&version=v2.0"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

[ad_2] Source link

Bloggers have won the first round in a legal battle with the government over the Computer Misuse and Cyber Crime Act after the High Court ruled that the disputed law remains suspended. Lady Justice Wilfrida Okwany dismissed the government’s request to have the law enforced, saying the temporary order issued earlier by her colleague, Justice Enoch Chacha Mwita, was justified. “I find that the injury complained of has to be balanced with the legal requirement that all laws pass the constitutional validity test,” said Justice Okwany. She added: “In addition to the above consideration, the court is also bound to consider where the public interest lies and, in this case, I find that nothing can be of great public interest than the court playing its constitutional mandate of ensuring that the individual rights and freedoms are protected and that laws, especially those creating offences, conform to the law.” On May 29, Justice Mwita temporarily suspended implementation of 22 sections of the cybercrime law which allegedly limits fundamental freedoms, including those of information and expression. The judge issued the order in a case in which the Bloggers Association of Kenya (BAKE) sued the Attorney-General, the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Inspector-General of Police and the Director of Public Prosecution. The Kenya Union of Journalists and Article 19 are listed as interested parties in the case which challenges sections of the Computer Misuse and Cyber Crimes Act 2018. But the AG, through the Solicitor General, asked the court to set aside that order while claiming that it would be difficult to charge suspects with certain offences created by the new Act or fulfil some international obligations. Justice Okwany dismissed this request and ruled that it would be improper for her to heed the government’s plea. She faulted the AG for tactfully delaying the case instead of allowing the constitutionality of sections of the disputed law to be determined once and for all. “A perusal of the order issued by Justice Mwita shows that he satisfied himself that there was a prema facie case warranting the specific orders that he issued,” said Justice Okwany. But Bake argues that this is already taken care of under the Defamation Act and that criminal libel or defamation was declared unconstitutional by the High Court in February 2017. Source link

Drama unfolded at NSSF headquarters when three suspended officials attempted to get back to their offices claiming that they had been cleared by the Director of Public Prosecution Keriako Tobiko. Managing trustee Richard Lang’at, finance and investment general manager Gideon Kyengo and property development manager Mutemi Nzatu attempted to return to NSSF but were turned away. It has emerged that the trio have allegedly been conning contractors and suppliers pretending they are back in office and would facilitate payments of pending bills. NSSF board is said not to be comfortable with the group more so, after they invaded the offices and a disciplinary action is to be taken. They claimed William Ruto had ordered them to report at work. Cotu boss Francis Atwoli threatened to institute private prosecutions against them if it is true they had been cleared. The Tassia II project involving suspicious award in the tender that led to loss of millions will form the base of private prosecution. Already, lawyers have been instructed to start filing the private prosecutions. Lang’at was also accused of flouting procurement rules in the award of a tender for design, supply and installation of a security surveillance system. He is said to have influenced award of the tender. Kyengo and Nzatu were suspended over alleged fraud in the Sh5 billion Tassia II scheme. They are accused of irregularly approving the budget and awarding the tender to China Jiangxi International Kenya Ltd. Sources say whereas Lang’at and his co-accused claim that they had been cleared by the DPP, it is now being said that the EACC has recommended administrative action against them over the Sh5 billion Tassia II tender awarded to the Chinese company for infrastructure development. Langat’s crime, the EACC found, was exposing the fund to contractual obligations when all the money to finance the project had not been collected from the tenants and that the administrative management of the tender process was fraught with irregularities and impropriety. It is said the opening of the tender, the evaluation committee’s recommendations and the tender committee meeting to award the tender apparently all took place on the same day, December 17 2013. Lang’at has also been accused of lying that the Nairobi county government had received Sh11, 244,000 as payment for submission and inspection of the project plan. However, it has been confirmed that the county government of Nairobi did not receive the payment. Sources say even if Tobiko clears them, their survival will be a tall order. With the constitution allowing private prosecution, then it is a ghost to haunt them forever. After the three were turned away, talk within the NSSF staff is that the three suspended bosses were vindictive, arrogant and isolated. It is said immediately Lang’at landed the plum slot, he transferred senior managers at the fund to outside stations for reasons best known to him. However, others say he was on a revenge mission. If he finds his way back, the staff is likely to revolt. Sources now say Lang’at could face private persecution after it also emerged that he was allegedly involved in the bribery deals by Chinese contractors. Further, his construction of a residential house in Langata area without a bank loan has surfaced and raised eyebrows. Lang’at and his team at one-time travelled to Dubai for a holiday where money is said to have exchanged hands with a Chinese firm representatives who had manipulated happenings and awarded a tender. The current acting NSSF managing Trustee is Antony Omerikwa from Teso. The region voted for Ruto URP and if Langat has his way back with the DP blessings, poilticians from the region will feel betrayed. To have him removed, Langat and his allies have a dossier implicating Omerikwa in dirty deals at the Fund.

Citizen

Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) has in a shock move slapped a moratorium on licensing new commercial banks throwing off balance the entry of Dubai Islamic Bank and the planned conversion of Unaitas Sacco. Dubai Islamic Bank (DIB) had received an approval “in principle” while awaiting the full licence. Staff hired by the Gulf-based bank on the basis of the approval reported early this week but the fate now hangs in the balance. “The Central Bank of Kenya has, with immediate effect, placed a moratorium on the licensing of new commercial banks until further notice,” it said, adding that the moratorium “does not apply to cases relating to resolution amalgamation and acquisition of banks.” The moratorium is likely to force up the price of fringe banks as well as shield large players from new competition. CBK has for six years frozen licensing without official order. At the time of going to press, Central Bank had not responded to queries on the reason for the moratorium. Notably, placement of the moratorium comes soon after the collapse of Dubai Bank and the closure of Imperial Bank due to fraud that the regulator failed to check. Nigerian United Bank of Africa was the last lender to acquire a licence to set up a green field operation in the country, six years ago. Other entrants have preferred acquisitions with DIB said to have been the only exception. Banks that have entered the market through acquisition include Bank M of Tanzania, which acquired majority stake in Oriental, Nigeria’s Guaranty Bank that acquired Fina in 2013 and West African Ecobank that took over East Africa Building Society. Others including India’s HDFC and Central Bank of India, Bank of China, Rabobank from the Netherlands, Bank of Kigali, Mauritius Commercial Bank and South Africa’s Nedbank and First Rand have set up representative offices. DIB, as it prefers to be called so as not to be confused with the fallen Dubai Bank, is completing setting up its headquarters at the offices previously occupied by Imperial Bank in Upper Hill. There is no known shareholder relationship between DIB and Imperial Bank. Unaitas Sacco has been raising capital while transforming its business so as to convert into a bank in the next three years. Unaitas Sacco’s total share capital increased to Sh1.44 billion in 2014 from Sh693 million a year earlier as a result of an aggressive membership recruitment drive that has resulted in members increasing by 43 per cent to 200,000 from 140,000 over the same period. The sacco has contracted Faida Investment Bank to guide it through the restructuring and RSM Ashvir as its accounting officers.

America’s largest bank JP Morgan Chase has also showed interest in opening a representative office in Kenya after failing in its initial effort two years ago. CBK blamed American regulator for stalling of the licensing.

Previously the regulator has sought consolidation in the banking sector by increasing capital requirements to no avail with the small banks matching new requirements. CBK rejected a proposal by the Treasury to raise the core capital for banks this year to Sh5 billion.

BD Africa

Fresh controversy has erupted at the University of Nairobi after the institution appointed Professor Ayub Njoroge Gitau as its new Vice-Chancellor despite an ongoing court battle over the recruitment process.

The appointment was approved during a special university council meeting on Thursday, May 14, ending months of leadership uncertainty at Kenya’s oldest university. The council said the move was aimed at restoring stability and strengthening academic excellence.

However, Professor Duke Omondi Orata accused the council of defying court orders that had suspended the recruitment process pending a case before the Employment and Labour Relations Court.

Orata argued that he became the leading candidate after Professor Bitange Ndemo withdrew from the race in 2025 and vowed to seek contempt charges against the council.

The leadership wrangles have deepened divisions between the university council and the Ministry of Education, with repeated court battles and political intervention destabilizing the institution since the exit of former VC Stephen Kiama.

The United States has sharply criticized the Cuban Medical Program, months after Kenya deepened its health cooperation with Havana. Washington now describes the program as exploitative and comparable to human trafficking. The criticism comes at a sensitive time for Nairobi, which recently signed new health agreements with Cuba and faced legal hurdles over a separate U.S.-Kenya health framework. As geopolitical tensions rise, Kenya finds itself caught between global powers competing for influence in its healthcare system and its broader development agenda. US President Donald Trump frames the Cuban Medical Program as exploitative, pressuring Kenya to balance healthcare benefits with U.S. warnings while navigating the geopolitical fallout of past and ongoing international scrutiny. Why the Cuban Medical Program Is Under Fresh U.S. Scrutiny The renewed criticism of the Cuban Medical Program follows remarks by Marco Rubio, the U.S. Secretary of State, who publicly condemned Cuba’s overseas medical missions. Speaking on Wednesday, February 25, Rubio accused the Cuban government of exploiting its own medical professionals by withholding most of their earnings and restricting their freedom of movement.

Rubio argued that host governments pay large sums of money to the Cuban state, yet doctors allegedly receive only a fraction of that compensation. He claimed the arrangement resembles labour trafficking because the Cuban government controls doctors’ contracts, travel, and remuneration. According to him, governments that participate in the Cuban Medical Program effectively channel funds to the Cuban regime instead of directly benefiting the professionals on the ground.

He further stated that Cuban doctors often work under conditions that limit their personal freedom, suggesting that they cannot move freely or negotiate independent contracts. Rubio insisted that such terms undermine basic labour rights and international standards.

His remarks gained additional attention after reports that Cuban military forces allegedly fired on a U.S. boat off Cuba’s northern coast on the same day, killing four people and injuring six others. Although the maritime incident and the medical program are separate issues, the timing intensified political tensions and sharpened Washington’s rhetoric against Havana.

For Kenya, the criticism raises questions about the long-term implications of engaging in the Cuban Medical Program at a time when it also seeks closer ties with the United States. Kenya’s Expanding Cooperation Under the Cuban Medical Program Kenya formally strengthened its engagement with Cuba in June 2025 when the Ministry of Health signed a cooperation agreement aimed at boosting universal health coverage. Under the deal, Cuba would leverage its community-based primary healthcare model to support Kenya’s grassroots health system.

Health Cabinet Secretary Aden Duale championed deeper collaboration between the two countries. He pushed for expanded partnerships in digital health, telemedicine, technical exchanges, and biotechnology. The agreement also explored Cuban support in local vaccine production and pharmaceutical manufacturing, with both sides proposing a structured memorandum of understanding to guide service delivery and academic exchanges.

Cuba has supported Kenya’s health sector for years. The Cuban Medical Program deployed 84 Cuban doctors to Kenyan counties and trained 48 Kenyan doctors through joint programs. The cooperation aimed to fill specialist gaps, especially in underserved regions.

Supporters argue that Cuban doctors have strengthened county hospitals and improved access to specialized care. They point to Cuba’s strong record in primary healthcare and preventive medicine, which aligns with Kenya’s push for universal health coverage.

However, Washington’s intervention now casts a shadow over that partnership. The U.S. position suggests that any continued participation in the Cuban Medical Program could carry diplomatic consequences. Kenya now stands at the intersection of these competing narratives. Its decisions will shape not only the future of its health sector but also its diplomatic posture in an increasingly polarized global environment. U.S. Health Deal Suspension Adds Political Complexity The timing of the criticism becomes even more significant when viewed alongside Kenya’s suspended health cooperation framework with the United States.

U.S. courts recently halted a Ksh 200 billion health deal between Nairobi and Washington. The decision followed an earlier ruling by the High Court in Kenya, where Justice Bahati Mwamuye issued conservatory orders blocking the agreement’s implementation.

Justice Mwamuye suspended the framework over concerns tied to the transfer of health and personal data. The ruling restrained the Kenyan government and its agents from implementing the agreement until the legal issues are resolved.

The suspended U.S.-Kenya deal aimed to digitize healthcare infrastructure, strengthen emergency preparedness, and improve supply chain systems. It also promised to enhance workforce development across the sector. Many observers viewed it as a major step toward modernizing Kenya’s health system.

Now, with Washington criticizing the Cuban Medical Program and its own health deal under suspension, Kenya faces a delicate balancing act. Policymakers must weigh the benefits of Cuban expertise in community healthcare against the geopolitical and diplomatic risks highlighted by the United States.

At the heart of the dispute lies a broader question about sovereignty and strategy. Kenya seeks to expand healthcare access, modernize infrastructure, and boost local pharmaceutical production. It also wants to maintain strong relations with global partners.

The U.S. frames its criticism of the Cuban Medical Program as a human rights issue tied to labour exploitation. Cuba and its supporters portray the missions as solidarity-based medical cooperation that benefits developing nations.

South Korea’s former president Yoon Suk Yeol has been sentenced to five years in prison. After a Seoul court found him guilty of obstructing justice and abusing his power to shield himself from arrest over a failed martial law bid. The ruling marks the first criminal verdict tied to his short‑lived December 2024 martial law declaration And is a major moment for a country that has already seen several ex-presidents jailed for corruption and abuse of power. A Seoul court has sentenced former South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol to five years in prison for obstructing investigators and abusing power during his failed 2024 martial law bid, in the first verdict tied to the crisis. What the court decided The Seoul Central District Court ruled that Yoon ordered the Presidential Security Service to block anti‑corruption investigators from executing a lawfully issued arrest warrant at his residence in January 2025. Judges said he effectively “privatized” state security officers. Also, directing them to protect his personal interests by preventing the execution of warrants and helping to destroy or tamper with evidence. ​ He was also found guilty of other charges linked to the martial law episode. Including violating legal procedures required to declare an emergency rule and fabricating or altering official documents related to the decree. Prosecutors had asked for up to 10 years, but the panel settled on five years. Therefore, citing his lack of prior criminal record as a mitigating factor while stressing that the nature of the crimes was very bad and that he showed no remorse. ​ The failed martial law declaration On the night of 3 December 2024, Yoon abruptly declared emergency martial law, citing political gridlock and what he described as obstruction of government by opposition parties. The move suspended parts of civilian rule and shocked South Koreans, triggering huge street protests and a rapid backlash in parliament. Within hours, the National Assembly convened and revoked the decree, and impeachment proceedings followed, ultimately forcing Yoon from office. ​ Investigators later alleged that Yoon not only bypassed cabinet members when planning the decree. But also ordered aides to draft, revise, and then destroy martial law proclamations and related records after the measure was overturned. Friday’s ruling is the first of several verdicts he faces; in a separate case, prosecutors have even sought the death penalty over accusations that the martial law declaration amounted to leading an insurrection against constitutional order. ​ Judge’s reasoning and Yoon’s response Presiding Judge Baek Dae‑hyun said Yoon had a duty “above all others” as president to uphold the constitution. And rule of law but instead used his “enormous influence” to evade legal scrutiny and obstruct official duties. The court highlighted how security officers and senior officials were drawn into protecting Yoon personally, calling it a serious distortion of state institutions. ​ Yoon has consistently denied wrongdoing, arguing that declaring martial law was within presidential powers. Also, the investigation by the Corruption Investigation Office for High‑ranking Officials overstepped its authority. He has seven days to appeal, and his defense team signaled plans to challenge the verdict, saying the ruling criminalizes decisions made in a moment of political crisis. ​ Broader implications for South Korea The sentence reinforces South Korea’s pattern of holding former leaders legally accountable. Following past convictions of presidents Park Geun‑hye, Lee Myung‑bak, and others on corruption and abuse‑of‑power charges. Legal analysts say the ruling sends a strong signal that any attempt to bend security agencies or emergency powers for personal survival, even in a crisis, will face harsh scrutiny in court. ​ Politically, the case will influence upcoming trials, including the more serious insurrection proceedings. And may deepen partisan divides between Yoon’s conservative base and opponents who pushed for his removal. Internationally, the verdict is likely to be seen as another example of South Korea’s judiciary acting as a robust check on executive overreach, even at the highest level of power. ALSO READ: ​ Who Is Druski? Comedian Behind the Viral Mega Church Skit Shaking Up the Internet

Kenya may have to wait longer for a US Ambassador to Kenya, a delay linked to multiple political and administrative challenges in Washington. President Donald Trump has shown an aversion to leaders and governments that worked closely with his predecessor, Joe Biden, affecting diplomatic postings across Africa. The recent US government shutdown and executive orders on foreign policy have compounded the hold-ups. Meanwhile, the US mission in Nairobi continues to function under Chargé d’Affaires Susan Burns, who manages diplomatic engagements while awaiting a formal ambassadorial appointment. Despite the absence of a confirmed US Ambassador to Kenya, Chargé d’Affaires Susan Burns continues to maintain trade, security, and health cooperation, ensuring strong bilateral relations endure amid ongoing political delays. US Ambassador to Kenya Vacancy Signals Tensions Between Trump and African Leaders The US government requires that ambassadorial appointments go through Senate confirmation before a nominee can take office in a foreign mission. Speaking to NTV, US Chargé d’Affaires Susan Burns confirmed that the expected appointments were initially scheduled before the end of the year but were delayed by the October government shutdown. “Currently, we have a Chargé d’Affaires, which means an acting ambassador. In our system, we need ambassadors confirmed by the Senate. We do not have one yet for Kenya,” Burns said. Despite not holding the official title, Burns is empowered to handle all diplomatic affairs, including trade, security, health, and investment. She added that while minor protocols like flying the American flag on vehicles are not observed, her authority to conduct diplomatic business is intact. Kenya has continued cooperating with the US mission, even under an acting head. Trade, health, security, and defense remain top priorities for the bilateral relationship. Burns emphasized that her team’s working relationship with Kenyan officials has remained strong despite the delay. Trump Executive Orders and African Diplomacy Observers note that the delay in appointing a US Ambassador to Kenya reflects broader patterns in Trump’s foreign policy. The president has expressed negativity toward governments and leaders who collaborated closely with the Biden administration. This approach has slowed several diplomatic postings across Africa, with Kenya among the nations affected. While Trump’s concerns over US funding for counterterrorism operations in Somalia have raised questions, Burns reassured that security cooperation with Kenya will continue. Kenya remains a critical partner in regional counterterrorism, and the US mission in Nairobi continues to coordinate efforts against Al-Shabaab and other threats. Health and Trade Agreements Hang in the Balance Another key factor behind the delay is the need to renegotiate bilateral agreements affected by previous freezes. Burns revealed that the US and Kenya are working on a new five-year health agreement to replace previously suspended USAID support. Negotiations for a refreshed African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) trade deal are also ongoing. The process slowed partly due to the government shutdown and the requirement of US Congressional approval. While the official AGOA pact remains inactive, Kenyan exports to the US continue to enjoy low tariffs, with only 10 percent applied to most goods. The US mission in Nairobi is keen on finalizing these agreements, which are expected to boost trade, health, and investment ties. Burns stressed that despite delays, Washington remains committed to strengthening its relationship with Kenya. Chargé d’Affaires Holds the Fort Chargé d’Affaires Susan Burns functions as the acting US Ambassador to Kenya. Her role allows her to oversee all aspects of the mission, from diplomatic meetings to regional security coordination. While she does not have the ceremonial trappings of a full ambassador, including presenting credentials to the Kenyan president, Burns continues to manage the mission effectively. She highlighted that bilateral cooperation remains robust despite the acting status of the US mission. Trade and health negotiations continue, security partnerships persist, and investment discussions remain active. Burns’ leadership ensures continuity in US-Kenya relations until a formal ambassador is appointed. The delay underscores the political reality that US foreign policy can shift sharply between administrations. Kenya, despite being a longstanding partner, finds itself navigating these uncertainties while awaiting full diplomatic representation. President Trump’s cautious approach to ambassadorial appointments suggests that the US Ambassador to Kenya position may remain vacant longer than expected. Meanwhile, Kenyan officials continue to engage with Burns and her team to sustain momentum in trade, security, and health collaborations.

Workers who helped build the hype behind a recent celebrity fight event are now crying in pain after Juicebet, a fast-rising betting company, allegedly used illegal wage deductions, unrealistic targets, and intimidation tactics to deny them their rightful pay. Many workers say they entered the job with hope, only to leave with losses, broken trust, and fear because the company forced them to sign strict NDAs. The workers describe a disturbing pattern. Juicebet hired them for weekly market storm promotions, promised a fixed amount, then slowly introduced harsh targets that were impossible to meet. When employees fell short, the company slashed their pay without warning or explanation. Later, the company suddenly suspended their work, blamed internal managers, and disappeared with their wages. Now, one month later, the company continues sponsoring events and growing its brand while the same workers who built that brand remain unpaid. The silence feels like a slap, especially in this economy where every coin matters. This is a wake-up call to regulators and the public: Juicebet cannot exploit hardworking employees with impunity. Workers deserve justice, accountability, and full payment for every shilling they earned. Silence is complicity, and it’s time the company faces consequences for Juicebet Mistreating Employees. How Juicebet Mistreating Employees Became a Quiet Crisis The controversy started quietly. Market storm teams were hired to promote Juicebet during a busy sports weekend linked to a celebrity fight. Workers signed contracts and NDAs expecting stability and clear weekly pay. Everything looked normal in the first days. Workers hit their tasks, gave out marketing material, and created signups for the betting platform. Then the rules changed. Juicebet suddenly introduced aggressive daily targets. Teams now had to deliver a specific number of signups and force deposits of not less than KSh 3500 per person . Workers say this requirement ignored the reality that every location has different foot traffic and different customer behavior. When targets were not reached, Juicebet deducted wages without warning and without any written explanation. Sample of the New System Workers Faced Requirement Condition Outcome Daily signups Fixed and increased unexpectedly Salary cut when target not met Minimum deposit per client KSh 3500 Punishment when customers refused Weekly pay agreement Stated in contract Paid a fraction or nothing Job security Promised during recruitment Workers dismissed without warning Workers say the company used these unrealistic targets to justify massive deductions. Many went home with a quarter of their promised pay , some with even less. Pay Games and Delayed Payments When workers asked about missing money, Juicebet officials promised payment by the end of the week. Then they shifted the story. Suddenly the person “supposed to authorize the money” was on a flight. Days turned into weeks. One month later, workers were still unpaid. During this delay, Juicebet continued sponsoring events across Nairobi and advertising its brand loudly. Workers watched the company pour money into shows and clubs while ignoring the wages they earned in the hot sun. Bullet points shared by workers show the widening contradictions Juicebet told workers to wait for payment, then shut down payment channels Company claimed management was unavailable, yet continued funding events Staff groups were locked so only administrators could speak Workers who asked for updates were met with rude replies or threats This has left many young people feeling cheated and humiliated. Sudden Job Freeze and Scapegoating Workers say Juicebet later froze the marketing job completely. The owner reportedly discovered that senior officials were manipulating the process. Instead of fixing the system or compensating those affected, the company dismissed teams silently. Many believe they were used as scapegoats in a wider internal fight. Their wages were never returned. One worker shared the pain directly “It hurts because people are still using the site. They are still sponsoring events. Who is authorizing all that when the same person cannot authorize our money? Every time you ask, they remind you about the contract and the NDA.” The NDA has now become a weapon. Workers say they fear speaking openly because the company threatens legal consequences. They worry that exposing Juicebet Mistreating Employees could lead to retaliation, yet staying silent means accepting exploitation. Why the Scand of Juicebet Mistreating Employees Matters This case highlights a bigger issue in Kenya’s gig economy. Many young people depend on temporary marketing jobs. When a big company withholds wages or changes terms without notice, workers have no protection. Most cannot afford lawyers. Many fear blacklisting. Juicebet Mistreating Employees is more than a headline. It is a story about survival in a tough economy, where companies hold all the power and workers risk everything for a few thousand shillings. Unless regulators intervene, this system will continue punishing the very people who help companies grow.

Kenya woke up on Monday to a disturbing digital assault that exposed the fragility of the government’s online infrastructure. Several govt websites hacked in a coordinated attack left citizens unable to access essential public services. The timing has raised deeper political questions. The attack came only days after President William Ruto signed the controversial 2024 CyberCrime Amendment Bill into law. Critics believe the hackings could provide the perfect excuse for the State to enforce strict cybercrime controls. The High Court has already suspended key sections of the new Act, saying it may violate constitutional freedoms. Kenya must strengthen cyber defenses, ensure transparency, and avoid exploiting digital crises to justify intrusive laws that threaten public freedoms and trust. Govt Websites Hacked Raises Questions on Security and Political Motives The cyberattack struck early Monday morning. Users trying to access multiple government portals found defaced landing pages carrying disturbing messages. Attackers posted extremist phrases including Access denied by PCP, We will rise again, White power worldwide, and 14:88 Heil Hitler. The defacement shocked many Kenyans, not only because of the hateful content but also because it exposed deep system weaknesses.

The attack shut down access to crucial online services. Citizens could not process personal documents, check public notices, or reach important departments. The state had no response hours into the incident, adding to confusion and fear. Govt Websites Hacked and Services Affected A wide range of ministries, agencies, and county systems went offline. Here is a summary of affected and unaffected services. Affected Websites and Portals Category Websites affected Security Directorate of Criminal Investigations Executive State House website Finance and development Directorate of Public-Private Partnerships Citizen services Immigration Department, Government Press, Hustler Fund County systems Nairobi County online services Nairobi County suffered total disruption, leaving residents stranded. The attack also hit the Government Press, delaying publication of critical notices and updates. Unaffected Websites and Portals Category Websites running normally Transport NTSA Judiciary Judiciary of Kenya Exams and education KNEC Security National Police Service Citizen services eCitizen platform Interestingly, the Defence and Treasury ministries were spared, according to field checks. Govt Websites Hacked and Deafening Silence from the State By the time of publishing, the government had issued no statement. Officials from affected agencies also kept silent. No hacking group claimed responsibility, leaving Kenyans wondering whether the attack was foreign, local, or state-linked.

The silence has only fuelled speculation. Many Kenyans asked whether the government is withholding information to avoid exposing deeper vulnerabilities. Others argued the attack could be convenient for the political narrative around the new cybercrime law. The Shadow of the Cybercrime Amendment Bill The cyberattack arrived at a politically sensitive moment. President Ruto had recently approved the Computer Misuse Cybercrimes Amendment Act 2024, which introduced new powers to monitor, restrict, and penalize digital activity.

However, the High Court suspended key sections of the law after activists filed a constitutional petition. They argued that several clauses threaten privacy, free speech, and media freedoms.

With the law temporarily stalled, the sudden attack on government websites has raised tough questions. Was the attack a convenient crisis to justify strict cyber regulations Several analysts see a pattern. Whenever a major digital law faces public resistance, a well-timed cyber incident seems to follow.

Some critics believe the government may use the Monday attack to argue that Kenya faces an urgent security threat requiring tighter control over online spaces. With the govt websites hacked, the State now has a strong narrative to push for quick enforcement of the suspended sections. Bullet points summarizing public concerns The attack provides political justification for stronger surveillance. The timing appears too convenient for a government facing legal setbacks. Past attacks have been used to support national security narratives. The silence from officials fuels suspicion. A Look Back at the 2023 Attacks This is not the first time Kenya has faced large-scale digital sabotage . In 2023, a Sudanese hacker group called Sudan Anonymous claimed responsibility for bringing down multiple government platforms. The group accused Kenya of interference in Sudan’s internal affairs. However, they never provided evidence to support their claims.

The 2025 attack is different. The messages left behind point to extremist groups rather than political activists. So far, no cyber group, no extremist cell, and no hacktivists have stepped forward. What Govt Websites Being Hacked Means for Kenya’s Digital Future Kenya’s digital systems sit at the centre of public service delivery. When these systems fall, daily life stalls. Monday’s attack exposed how fragile the national cyber infrastructure has become. Key concerns raised by experts include: Weak system monitoring Slow incident response Poor coordination between ministries Outdated cyber defence frameworks Lack of transparency after attacks The country now faces two parallel battles. One is technical. Kenya must upgrade its digital defences and respond faster to cyber threats. The second is political. The government must prove it is not using fear to justify controversial laws.

If Kenya fails to address both issues, future attacks will not just shut down websites. They will damage trust, weaken institutions, and disrupt national stability.

Wendy Williams, the unfiltered "Queen of All Media," once commanded a vast fortune built on a record-breaking career in radio and television.

Her signature talk show, The Wendy Williams Show , earned her millions, making her one of the wealthiest women in daytime television.

However, the story of Wendy Williams net worth in 2025 is a sharp and heartbreaking contrast to her peak earnings, dominated by severe health battles, a financial guardianship, and frozen assets. Wendy Williams Net Worth The Stark Reality of Wendy Williams Net Worth in 2025 The decline of Wendy Williams' fortune is a public, painful story. Estimated Peak Net Worth: At her peak, Williams was estimated to be worth over $40 million . Current Estimated Net Worth: As of 2025, Williams' estimated net worth is publicly stated to be around $5 million . This staggering drop reflects her loss of income from her talk show, mounting legal fees, and the immense difficulty she faces accessing her own liquid capital due to court-ordered control. The Golden Era The bulk of Williams' wealth was generated during her 13-season run as a daytime talk show titan , following a successful three-decade career in radio. Talk Show Salary: At her height, Williams commanded a massive salary of approximately $10 million per year for The Wendy Williams Show . This broke down to roughly $55,000 per episode for her nearly 180 annual episodes. Radio Royalty: Before her television success, Williams was inducted into the National Radio Hall of Fame in 2009 for her widely syndicated and hugely popular The Wendy Williams Experience radio show. This established her brand and secured her initial wealth. Income Suspension: Williams' income from the show officially stopped accruing in October 2021 after her contract was suspended due to health issues, signaling the beginning of her financial difficulties. Conservatorship and Legal Battles The dramatic reduction in Wendy Williams net worth is largely tied to a court-ordered financial guardianship that stripped her of control over her assets. Wells Fargo Freeze: The legal saga began in early 2022 when Wells Fargo froze her accounts, citing concerns from her former financial advisor over her "unsound mind" and fears of financial exploitation. Guardianship Appointed: A New York judge placed Williams under a financial guardianship (which has since become more comprehensive, covering both her health and finances) due to her health issues, including a diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and aphasia in 2024. Locked Assets: While the reported $5 million net worth suggests she retains substantial assets, Williams herself has publicly claimed, "I have no money." This stark statement underscores the reality that she cannot currently access or control her bank accounts and funds. Assets Remaining Despite her financial difficulties, Williams retains millions of dollars in valuable hard assets, though their liquidity remains controlled by her guardian, Sabrina Morrissey. Luxury Homes: Her property portfolio, though subject to sale and tax liens, includes significant investments. She has owned a large New Jersey mansion, a Manhattan penthouse, and a luxury condo in New York City. Tax Troubles: Compounding her issues, the IRS reportedly filed a significant tax lien against her Manhattan condo in 2024 for unpaid federal taxes from previous years. Conclusion Wendy Williams’ story is a cautionary tale of how quickly a huge personal fortune can be challenged by health crises and legal oversight.

Her current net worth figure represents a tragedy of inaccessible wealth, illustrating the profound challenges of managing a massive celebrity estate during a serious health battle.

The High Court has handed Kenyans a major win for digital freedom after suspending key sections of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act 2024 that allowed the government to shut down social media platforms and block websites. Justice Lawrence Mugambi ruled that the disputed provisions will remain suspended until the ongoing petitions challenging their legality are fully heard and determined. This ruling marks a crucial step in protecting free speech and digital expression while the court reviews the constitutionality of the controversial Cybercrimes Act. Justice Mugambi’s ruling offers a crucial shield for Kenya’s digital freedom, ensuring online spaces remain open and accessible while courts examine whether the Cybercrimes Act complies with the Constitution. High Court Suspends Controversial Sections of Cybercrimes Act Justice Lawrence Mugambi’s ruling on Thursday temporarily halted the enforcement of Sections 27(1)(b) and 6 of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act 2024. These provisions granted the government power to close social media platforms and block websites or mobile applications accused of promoting unlawful content.

The judge clarified that the suspension will remain in effect until six consolidated petitions filed against the Act are resolved. “Following the parties’ agreement, the court adopts the same as a consent order and allows the suspension of Sections 6 and 27 of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act pending hearing and determination of this case,” Mugambi ruled.

Section 6(1)(j)(a), one of the suspended clauses, had sparked concern among digital rights groups. It allowed the state to block platforms accused of hosting obscene or intimidating material, particularly those involving minors. Critics argued that the vague language in the law opened doors for government overreach and censorship under the guise of morality and national security. Justice Mugambi’s Decision Protects Social Media Freedom Justice Mugambi emphasized that social media platforms will remain operational until the court determines whether the law violates constitutional guarantees on freedom of expression and access to information. He stated that the government must not interfere with digital communication channels until the court concludes the matter.

The decision came after the Attorney General, the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA), Members of Parliament, and the petitioners agreed to limit the previous court orders that had suspended the entire Act. The original suspension, issued on October 22, had halted enforcement of all amendments, a move that the state argued was too broad.

“The court recognizes the importance of digital platforms in fostering communication, business, and civic engagement,” Justice Mugambi noted. “Any restriction must pass the test of legality, necessity, and proportionality.” State and Petitioners Clash Over Scope of Suspension Attorney General’s lawyer Paul Nyamodi told the court that the government had reached a consensus with other parties to narrow the suspension to only two contentious sections. “After consultations with all parties, we have agreed to amend the earlier orders and suspend only two sections of the Cybercrimes Act until the case is heard and determined,” Nyamodi said.

On the other hand, Patrick Lutta, representing the Communications Authority, argued that the initial suspension had disrupted enforcement of provisions that help maintain online safety and combat digital crime. He said the state needed to continue enforcing other sections to address issues like online fraud, cyberbullying, and data theft.

The original suspension stemmed from petitions by gospel artist Reuben Kigame and Kirinyaga Woman Representative Jane Njeri. They argued that the amendments signed by President William Ruto on October 15, 2025, violated constitutional freedoms by allowing the government to arbitrarily restrict digital platforms and penalize online expression. Petitioners Warn of Threats to Digital Rights Petitioners and rights groups welcomed the court’s latest ruling, terming it a temporary safeguard against state censorship. They maintained that the contested provisions posed a real threat to journalists, bloggers, and content creators who rely on digital platforms to express opinions and share information.

Section 27 of the law, now under suspension, criminalizes online communication that could lead a recipient to self-harm or suicide. Critics argued that while the clause aimed to curb cyber harassment, its broad wording could criminalize legitimate criticism or opinionated posts.

Legal experts say the suspension will allow time for a deeper constitutional review of the Act’s implications on free speech. “This case is a test of how far the state can go in regulating online spaces without violating fundamental rights,” said a Nairobi-based lawyer following the case.

For now, the court’s order means Kenyans can continue using platforms like X (Twitter), Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube without fear of sudden government shutdowns.

A growing unease is taking hold among forex traders in Kenya who operate through online proprietary trading firms that promise funding, profit sharing and exposure to global markets but often retain sweeping control over accounts, balances and payout procedures that can be withdrawn without notice.

Behind the glossy social media advertisements that speak of opportunity and independence lies a web of opaque rules and algorithmic decisions that determine whether a trader’s success translates into real income or vanishes at the moment of withdrawal. A Kenyan forex trader loses millions after international firm VPropTrader deactivated his account moments after a withdrawal request.

In early October, a Nairobi-based forex trader participating in a funded account programme run by an international firm known as VPropTrader began to experience precisely that kind of digital erasure.

For nearly a month, the trader engaged exclusively in gold trading, focusing on the XAU/USD pair while adhering to every operational limit prescribed in the firm’s terms.

Those stipulations, standard in the proprietary trading industry, required strict discipline on exposure and drawdown, capping daily losses at USD 30 (KSh3,930) and setting a 35 % ceiling on consistency deviation across sessions.

Upon fulfilling these metrics, traders would normally qualify to withdraw their profit share under an eighty-to-twenty split arrangement, a mechanism designed to reward disciplined performance.

The documentation reviewed by this publication shows that over the course of October, the trader’s account accumulated a verified profit of USD 1,478 (approximately KSh 193,000) from an initial funded balance of USD 1,000 (KSh 131,000).

Trading records reveal a consistent pattern of small-volume, low-risk buy positions on gold, executed within defined limits and aligned with the firm’s stated conditions.

The platform’s internal records confirmed eligibility for withdrawal after compliance checks were completed. Profit Lockout It was at this juncture, when the trader sought to process the withdrawal through the company’s internal portal, that the system abruptly shifted from verification to exclusion.

The trader had been issued a withdrawal ticket (Request Number 2025101613081818) alongside a message acknowledging compliance and instructing that funds be transferred from the MetaTrader 5 terminal to the internal wallet balance before withdrawal but moments after this process was initiated, the platform displayed an error message and access to the trading account was instantly suspended.

Within minutes, the account was marked as deactivated.

The official explanation that followed cited a violation involving “multiple linked accounts,” a category often used by firms to justify termination.

The trader maintains, however, that all trading activity originated from a single mobile device and that no proxy, duplicate, or shared access existed. Login records reviewed by this newsroom corroborate that claim, showing consistent IP data and uninterrupted session integrity throughout the trading period.

No external login events or overlapping connections were detected.

Nonetheless, the platform’s algorithm flagged the account, permanently freezing both access and accumulated profits. Account Switch In a follow-up communication, the trader reported uncovering an additional irregularity involving his trading instrument.

He stated that the gold pair he had traded throughout October appeared under the symbol “XAUUSD.w,” but after the deactivation, the platform interface displayed only “XAUUSD” — without the “w” suffix.

According to him, this change suggested that the firm may have duplicated or swapped the live account with a pseudo copy reflecting the same balance but disconnected from the real trading record.

Screenshots reviewed by this publication show the discrepancy, adding weight to the trader’s suspicion that the system may have mirrored his results on a non-active account after suspending the original one.

Subsequent attempts to engage the firm’s support team through its communication portal yielded no substantive response.

Within hours, the trader’s access to the dashboard and chat interface had been revoked entirely. Recurring Pattern The case, while individual in circumstance, fits a discernible pattern that has become increasingly familiar to Kenyan traders working through foreign proprietary platforms.

Many describe a recurring cycle: profitability is achieved, eligibility is confirmed, and the moment a withdrawal request is initiated, the account is disabled under claims of policy breach or technical anomaly.

Evidence shared with this publication paints a disquieting picture of how performance validation within such systems can be reversed without external verification or right of appeal.

Screenshots captured before the lockout show that the account’s profit, balance, and drawdown metrics all remained within prescribed limits.

Less than an hour later, automated notifications from the same platform declared the account ineligible for withdrawal, nullifying a month’s work without recourse or review.

The incident has reignited debate about the governance of proprietary trading firms that target emerging markets through digital advertising but operate from loosely regulated jurisdictions. In Kenya, agencies such as the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) and the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) do not currently license or supervise these offshore entities, which conduct operations entirely online while offering what appears to be institutional trading exposure.

The absence of cross-border oversight leaves traders without any formal avenue for redress once an account is suspended or a payout withheld.

For many local traders, the implications extend beyond financial loss.

A withdrawal of USD 1,478 (KSh 193,000) represents not just potential profit but months of analysis, discipline, and technical skill.

When such an outcome is reversed by a platform’s unilateral decision, it undermines confidence in the very notion of merit-based trading that these firms claim to promote.

The economic impact is compounded by emotional strain, as traders who invest both time and capital into mastering volatile markets find themselves disqualified by arbitrary technicalities.

Interviews with several Kenyan participants suggest that the experience is far from isolated.

Others recount similar encounters with different firms, where accounts were deactivated after achieving high returns under similar reasoning of alleged “third-party trading,” “AI-assisted execution,” or “linked devices.”

In most of these cases, no supporting evidence was ever disclosed, and communication ceased once access to the platform was revoked.

This pattern points to a structural imbalance that continues to define the relationship between offshore proprietary trading firms and local traders in developing economies.

The firms retain full control over account validation, performance verification, and fund release, while traders operate entirely at the mercy of automated systems and opaque terms of service.

It is a relationship built on ambition but fraught with asymmetry, where those who perform best often face the highest risk of exclusion.

Below is the full account shared by the trader, outlining his experience with the platform from the moment of registration to the sudden deactivation that followed his profit withdrawal request. "Hi Nyakundi. I hope you are doing well. I am reaching out because I need help exposing what happened to me with a proprietary trading firm I had been working with this month. I have been trading gold with them throughout October, and after weeks of consistent effort, I made a profit of about USD 1,450. They even verified that I had qualified for withdrawal. However, the moment I pressed the withdraw button, my account was deactivated and they claimed that I had multiple accounts. That is completely false. I have only one phone, and I trade alone. Their explanation does not make any sense. I met every single rule they set out for the USD 1,000 funded account. I kept my daily losses below USD 30, stayed within the 35 percent consistency limit, and did not violate any other trading condition. Everything was clean and transparent on my end. I passed my evaluation on October 2, 2025, received the funded account, and began trading the XAU/USD (gold) pair. My trades were small, consistent, and low-risk, all within the rules. The system showed a balance of USD 2,426, which included my profit of USD 1,478, and I received a message from support confirming that I had met the withdrawal criteria. They even provided me with a withdrawal request number, 2025101613081818, and instructed me to transfer funds from the MT5 terminal to my internal wallet before completing the withdrawal. Moments after I followed those instructions, an error message appeared, and my account was locked. I was immediately logged out of both the dashboard and the chat portal. A few minutes later, I received a system notification stating that my account was linked to multiple accounts, which is not true. I trade from one device, one IP address, and one account. Within my circle, I am actually the only trader who trades profitably. Later on, while reviewing my trading records, I noticed something unusual that made me even more suspicious. The gold pair I had been trading throughout October appeared under the symbol “XAUUSD.w” on my MetaTrader terminal. After my account was deactivated, however, I realised that the platform now displayed only “XAUUSD” without the “.w” at the end. From what I can tell, this suggests that the firm may have swapped or duplicated my live trading account, leaving behind a pseudo copy with the same balance but disconnected from the real trade history. I still have screenshots showing this discrepancy. Since then, I have tried to contact their support several times, but I have not received any response. My dashboard access has been removed, and the chat feature has been disabled. It feels as if they waited for me to make a profit, verified everything, and then terminated my account immediately after I initiated the withdrawal request. I am not asking for special treatment. I only want fairness and transparency. Traders invest a great deal of time, effort, and emotional energy into this craft, and it is unfair for a company to erase all that without explanation or proof. I hope that my experience can help expose what these firms are doing to other traders as well."

The United States Embassy in Nairobi has announced the suspension of some of its operations following a lapse in appropriations in Washington, a crisis that has triggered a partial shutdown of government services. In a notice issued Wednesday, the embassy said its official X account would not be updated regularly until full operations resume. The only exceptions will be urgent safety and security alerts for U.S. citizens and residents in Kenya. Less than a year into his presidency, Donald Trump’s U.S. government has shut down, effective midnight. This leaves the future of bilateral relations with Kenya, currently at a critical stage of negotiation, hanging in limbo. The shutdown comes from a bitter standoff between Trump’s Republican Party and Democrats in Congress, each side accusing the other of blocking progress on healthcare, spending, and foreign aid. A temporary deal was on the table to extend funding for federal operations for seven weeks, but talks collapsed before lawmakers could reach an agreement. For Kenya, the impact could be severe. From suspended aid to slowed trade talks, the shutdown threatens to derail years of progress between Washington and Nairobi. The Trump shutdown is not just an American crisis. For Kenya, it is a reminder of how deeply global politics shape local futures, with jobs, aid, and trade now hanging in the balance. [Image: NR Lab] How Kenya is Affected When the US Govt Shuts Down Kenya is among the countries that may face major consequences from funding cuts pushed under Trump’s administration. Democrats had demanded the restoration of billions of dollars in healthcare and development spending, but the White House rejected those calls. U.S. funding to NGOs, development partners, and global programs in Kenya now faces delays, reassessment, or suspension. This could affect critical areas such as health, education, and food security. President William Ruto met with U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio during the UN General Assembly in New York last week, hoping to secure progress on key trade talks. But the shutdown has thrown those discussions into doubt. Economically, the crisis could shake investor confidence. Analysts warn of possible currency volatility, weaker foreign exchange positions, and delayed trade agreements such as the renewal of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Kenyan manufacturers, already under pressure from Trump’s tariff threats, have asked for a one- to two-year extension of AGOA following its expiry this week. The fear is that if the shutdown drags on, it could trigger a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, like what happened in 2011. That kind of global financial uncertainty would hit Kenya hard, raising borrowing costs and weakening the shilling. How AGOA Renewal Hangs in the Balance Kenya’s textile and manufacturing industries rely heavily on AGOA access to U.S. markets. With the program’s expiry coinciding with Washington’s shutdown, the timing could not be worse. Kenyan manufacturers, alongside other African exporters, lobbied U.S. lawmakers in a last-minute push to secure an extension. But with Congress paralyzed and federal operations frozen, the fate of AGOA remains unclear. The shutdown delays critical discussions and approvals that Kenya needs to keep its products competitive in U.S. markets. Without action, thousands of jobs in Kenya’s export sectors may be at risk. Aid and Development Programs Face Delays Beyond trade, U.S. aid has played a vital role in Kenya’s development programs, from healthcare to food security. With the shutdown, funding flows could dry up, leaving NGOs and local partners stranded. Programs fighting malaria, HIV/AIDS, and hunger depend heavily on U.S. government funding. Any prolonged disruption could weaken Kenya’s social safety nets and threaten lives. For Kenyan families already grappling with high living costs, a disruption in donor support could deepen poverty levels and strain public health services. Global Markets React to the Shutdown Markets worldwide are watching closely. A prolonged shutdown in the U.S. could shake investor confidence, trigger dollar volatility, and raise global interest rates. For Kenya, this means higher import costs, expensive loans, and delays in foreign investment. The Nairobi Securities Exchange could also feel the heat as investors pull back from emerging markets. Economists warn that a repeat of the 2011 downgrade in U.S. credit ratings would ripple across the globe, and Kenya’s fragile economy would not be spared. Wrapping Up The U.S. government shutdown is more than just a political battle in Washington. It has real consequences for Kenya, from trade and aid to investment and stability. Trump’s hardline stance, coupled with bitter partisan fights in Congress, risks undoing years of cooperation between Nairobi and Washington. For now, Kenya waits—its future deals in limbo, its trade programs under threat, and its citizens caught in the fallout of a superpower’s political gridlock.

A legal battle over the scheduled police recruitment exercise is set for a critical hearing on Tuesday, after the High Court in Nairobi directed parties to prepare their submissions without delay. Court to rule on whether police recruitment proceeds as petitioners challenge IG and NPSC roles in managing the exercise.

The case, lodged by the lobby group Sheria Mtaani, seeks to halt the nationwide intake of new officers planned for Friday, with petitioners claiming that the process raises constitutional disputes about the authority of the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the National Police Service Commission (NPSC).

Appearing before Justice Lawrence Mugambi at the Milimani Law Courts on Monday, lawyers Shadrack Wambui, Danstan Omari, and Cliff Ombeta urged the court to freeze the exercise until their petition is fully argued. They maintained that unless the recruitment is stopped, it risks proceeding under what they described as a flawed legal arrangement that diminishes constitutional safeguards. “We are ready to demonstrate that our petition discloses a serious case that deserves protection from this court,” Wambui told the bench, pressing for conservatory orders to safeguard the public interest. The state, represented by the Attorney General, opposed the request.

The AG’s office argued that the applicants had failed to meet the threshold for interim relief and warned that suspending the exercise would interfere with the independence of the Inspector-General, disrupt the chain of command, and derail lawful police operations.

Court documents filed by the AG cited Article 245 of the Constitution, which grants the IGP autonomous command over the police, while restricting the Commission from dictating employment, promotions, or disciplinary measures.

Payroll oversight, the AG added, is an administrative responsibility of the IGP, not a constitutional function of the NPSC, and any attempt to alter that balance would erode the separation of powers.

Counsel Paul Nyamodi, representing the NPSC, also called for an expedited hearing. “The petitioners are seeking conservatory orders, and the only proper course is to address their application immediately,” he told the court, confirming the Commission’s readiness to respond. At the close of the brief session, Justice Mugambi ordered all parties to exchange written submissions by Monday evening and directed them to reconvene at 10 a.m. on Tuesday.

The court’s decision will determine whether the mass recruitment of police recruits, expected to add thousands of new officers to the ranks, proceeds as scheduled or is suspended until the constitutional questions are settled.

Kenyan university students are staring at a bleak future as the stalemate between the government and lecturers deepens. The dons have openly defied Education Cabinet Secretary Julius Ogamba’s order to resume work immediately, vowing not to return until billions in unpaid arrears are cleared. The lecturers’ strike has now entered its second week, threatening to derail the academic calendar. With each passing day, frustration grows among students and parents, while union leaders accuse the government of dishonesty and disrespect. Education CS Migos Ogamba [PHOTO//Courtesy] Lecturers' Strike Intensifies After Ogamba Directive Union leaders have dismissed CS Julius Ogamba’s directive as both uninformed and insulting. Speaking on Citizen TV, Maloba Wekesa of the University Academic Staff Union (UASU) and Kenya Universities Staff Union (KUSU) Secretary General Charles Mukhwaya accused the government of failing to honour long-standing agreements.

Dr Wekesa said lecturers are law-abiding but will not allow themselves to be “gamed” by government orders. He insisted that Ogamba, who has only been in office for a year, should first understand the issues instead of issuing threats.

“This problem has been around longer than Ogamba has been in office. He should take time to learn instead of ordering us around,” Wekesa stated.

The lecturers argue that the government only released Ksh2.5 billion, which they consider a token gesture. They maintain that Ksh7.9 billion from the 2017 and 2021 collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) remains unpaid, leaving most of their demands unresolved.

Wekesa added that lecturers are not mere employees to be commanded. “We have lecture halls, not classes. If the CS thinks we need to go back to classes, he should go there himself. Ordering us back is an insult,” he said. Government Threatens Lecturers With Disciplinary Action On Tuesday, Ogamba directed all lecturers to resume work or face severe consequences. He warned that failure to comply would amount to contempt of court, following a ruling by the Employment and Labour Relations Court suspending the strike.

“Court orders are supposed to be obeyed. Otherwise, you will be in contempt, which might necessitate disciplinary action. We are asking lecturers to go back to work,” Ogamba said at a stakeholder forum in Mombasa.

The directive came after Justice Jacob Gakeri certified the matter as urgent and ordered both sides to negotiate in good faith. The court suspended the strike on September 18 following a petition by the Inter-Public Universities’ Councils Forum.

Despite this, lecturers remain defiant. They argue that no genuine negotiations have taken place and accuse the government of dragging its feet on commitments dating back nearly a decade. Students Bear the Brunt of Lecturers Strike The ongoing lecturers strike has left thousands of students stranded, unsure about the fate of their studies. With the strike now in its second week, the risk of an extended academic year looms large.

University managements have urged the government and unions to resolve the standoff quickly, warning that prolonged disruption could derail exams, graduations, and future admissions. Parents, too, have expressed frustration, accusing both sides of neglecting students’ welfare.

Dr Mukhwaya, speaking for KUSU, said the government’s consistent failure to honour negotiated CBAs has demoralised university staff for over seven years. “This crisis was inevitable. You cannot keep promising and failing to pay. Lecturers are frustrated and tired of empty words,” he said.

For now, students remain the biggest casualties of the hardline positions on both sides. Unless the government clears the arrears and engages in genuine talks, the academic future of many young Kenyans could collapse under the weight of broken promises.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHyIIex5I_E

Kenya is facing a chilling wave of targeted killings executed by boda boda hitmen. The recent assassination of City Lawyer Kyalo Mbobu in Nairobi has reignited fears about the growing culture of impunity. Barely five months earlier, Kasipul Kabondo MP Ong’ondo Were was also gunned down in a similar attack at the City Mortuary roundabout. These two high-profile killings underline a disturbing trend where assassins on motorcycles operate freely in the capital and beyond, leaving citizens questioning whether the Kenya Kwanza administration has lost control of the streets. The back-to-back assassinations now place LSK President Faith Odhiambo in the spotlight. She is expected to champion justice for City Lawyer Kyalo, but questions linger whether she has the energy and political capital to confront the forces believed to be behind these killings. [Photo: Courtesy] The assassination of City Lawyer Kyalu Mbobu On the evening of September 9, 2025, the city’s legal fraternity was thrown into shock after the cold-blooded murder of Advocate Mathew Kyalu Mbobu . The seasoned lawyer, with more than three decades of practice, was driving near the Galleria Brookside area along Magadi Road when his vehicle was ambushed. Two gunmen riding on motorcycles sprayed bullets into his car before fleeing into the night.

Police who arrived at the scene confirmed that Mbobu was hit multiple times. His lifeless body was transferred to Lee Funeral Home while investigators towed his vehicle to Lang’ata Police Station. Detectives later revealed the attack bore all the hallmarks of a targeted killing.

CCTV footage from Lang’ata Road is expected to provide clues, but Kenyans have heard this line too many times before. Justice rarely follows. Mbobu was not an ordinary lawyer. He once chaired the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal and mentored generations of young lawyers at the University of Nairobi.

His writings on evidence law remain influential in the legal fraternity. The brazenness of his murder has sent shivers across the legal profession, with many advocates now fearing they could be next.

Law Society of Kenya (LSK) President Faith Odhiambo released a statement describing Mbobu’s death as a brutal assassination. She called on security agencies to move with speed, warning that any delay would amount to dereliction of duty. But her statement, though strongly worded, carried a tone of fatigue. Observers noted that her energy has been low in recent days, even in her public engagements online. The earlier killing of Hon Ong’ondo Were Mbobu’s murder is not an isolated case. On April 30, 2025, Hon. Ong’ondo Were , the MP for Kasipul Kabondo, was assassinated in a similar manner. He was trailed by armed assailants after leaving Parliament and was killed at the busy Daystar University roundabout near City Mortuary. A motorcycle pulled alongside his vehicle at a traffic light, and the gunman opened fire at close range.

The incident caused chaos along Ngong Road as the killers sped off towards the CBD without resistance. Forensic officers recovered spent cartridges at the scene. Police investigations pointed to a well-planned hit involving both a trailing car and a motorbike, but months later, no mastermind has been charged in court.

Were’s assassination, like Mbobu’s, highlighted how Nairobi has become a hunting ground for political and legal targets. Motorcycles, once celebrated for easing traffic congestion, have now become the preferred weapon for hitmen. A motorcycle assassin shot Ong’ondo Were at close range on Ngong Road, causing chaos, forensic recovery, and months of investigations with no mastermind charged, highlighting Nairobi’s rising culture of impunity. [Photo: Courtesy] The test before Faith Odhiambo The back-to-back assassinations now place LSK President Faith Odhiambo in the spotlight. She is expected to champion justice for City Lawyer Kyalo, but questions linger whether she has the energy and political capital to confront the forces believed to be behind these killings.

Faith has endured a tough year. Her acceptance to serve on President William Ruto’s Protest Victims’ Compensation Panel, alongside Raila Odinga ally Prof Makau Mutua, was met with backlash. Critics accused her of abandoning independence and playing into the hands of state operatives. The High Court later suspended the panel’s work, further embarrassing her leadership.

Now, with Mbobu’s killing, Faith faces a defining moment. If she mobilises the legal fraternity to demand accountability, she could restore her standing and shake off the perception that she is a compromised leader. But if she hesitates or issues only tired statements, she risks losing relevance at a time when advocates are crying for protection.

Kenyans are asking whether she can withstand the political heat from the “big boys” rumoured to be behind Mbobu’s murder. These are individuals who allegedly operate above the law, shielded by connections within state security apparatus. Confronting them would require courage beyond rhetoric. A regime under siege by insecurity The rise of boda boda hitmen under Kenya Kwanza is no coincidence. These killings reveal a government that is either unwilling or incapable of curbing organized crime. Nairobi has become a playground for assassins, with the public growing weary of routine police pressers that lead nowhere.

Faith Odhiambo is right to warn that lawyers cannot practice in an environment of fear. Yet the responsibility goes beyond the LSK. President Ruto’s administration must demonstrate political will to dismantle the networks funding and protecting these killers. Failure to act will only confirm suspicions that elements within government are complicit.

The assassinations of Kyalu Mbobu and Ong’ondo Were show that no one is safe. Today it is lawyers and politicians; tomorrow it could be journalists, activists, or ordinary citizens who fall victim to motorcycle hit squads. The boda boda that once symbolised hustle is now a symbol of terror.

Kenya stands at a crossroads. Either the government restores order and reassures its citizens, or the culture of impunity deepens further. For Faith Odhiambo, this is the battle of her presidency. For Ruto’s regime, it is the litmus test of whether it truly values the rule of law.

Workers at Eurocraft Agencies Limited, a licensed ground handling company operating at both Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) and Moi International Airport, report that conditions have worsened despite earlier exposure of exploitative practices, painting a grim picture of an organization where employees feel trapped, undervalued and unprotected. Staff at Eurocraft Agencies Limited continue to endure low wages, harsh deductions, forced backup shifts, and exploitative management practices at JKIA and Moi Airport.

The company, which has been operating since its incorporation in 1993 and licensed by the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) in 1994, is responsible for essential airport services including aircraft loading, passenger handling, cabin grooming, and executive flight support and employs over 300 staff.

Despite its crucial role in ensuring smooth airport operations and its membership in the International Ground Handling Council, employees describe a workplace environment marked by inadequate pay, arbitrary deductions, delayed salaries, and a systemic disregard for labor standards that leave workers financially vulnerable and psychologically strained.

The grievances raised by employees cover a wide spectrum of exploitation.

Staff report that their monthly pay, often as low as Ksh 10,000, is subject to frequent and harsh deductions, sometimes leaving them with barely half of their expected income.

Deductions are imposed even when absences are communicated in advance, and employees describe situations where attending approved leaves or training sessions results in financial penalties.

While initial training and certifications should be provided free of charge, employees are now reportedly required to pay fees to obtain certificates, while requests for recommendation letters necessary to move to other companies are routinely denied, effectively limiting professional growth and trapping workers within the company.

A follow-up report from insiders indicates that conditions have deteriorated further since the initial exposure of malpractices.

https://twitter.com/C_NyaKundiH/status/1914037340881748292

Workers report being coerced into taking on backup shifts, which are inadequately compensated at as little as 30 shillings per hour, often without transport or support, making the shifts financially unviable.

Refusal to participate in these shifts reportedly results in warning letters and arbitrary salary deductions, creating a climate of fear and forced compliance.

Leave entitlements, which should allow employees at least 21 working days off, are reportedly withheld unless staff remain employed for years, while unpaid or underpaid salaries continue to create financial instability.

The follow-up grievances also reveal deeply troubling allegations of sexual coercion, where female employees are reportedly forced to engage in sexual acts under threat of suspension or confiscation of their work permits.

Employees who attempt to seek redress from the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) say their complaints have been ignored, leaving them without institutional support or protection, and further entrenching their sense of vulnerability and helplessness.

The personal toll of these exploitative practices is profound. Workers struggle to afford basic needs for themselves and their families, with some unable to seek medical care or provide for their children.

Previous reporting had highlighted a tragic case of a worker who passed away after being unable to access treatment or food due to withheld salaries and insiders now report that such instances are increasingly common, reflecting a pattern of neglect and disregard for employee welfare.

The financial strain, coupled with the constant pressure to comply with exploitative rules and the threat of punitive measures, has created a climate of stress, anxiety, and depression across the workforce.

The ongoing abuses at Eurocraft Agencies Limited expose systemic weaknesses in labor oversight and accountability at the airports.

The company operates under the purview of the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) employees report that repeated appeals for intervention, assistance, and protection have gone unanswered, suggesting institutional indifference to worker welfare and the perpetuation of exploitative practices.

Employees continue to perform essential tasks that keep the country's busiest airports operational but their sacrifices remain largely invisible and unrewarded, exposing a critical gap between the services they provide and the treatment they receive.

This follow-up report underscores that the grievances previously brought to public attention have not only persisted but have intensified, with new forms of abuse compounding the already difficult working conditions.

The combination of withheld salaries, coercion, inadequate compensation, and unsafe working environments paints a bleak picture of a workforce left to struggle in silence while performing duties that carry major risk and responsibility.

The situation at Eurocraft Agencies Limited continues to demand urgent attention from regulatory authorities, labour oversight bodies, and the broader public, as the employees remain trapped in conditions that compromise their wellbeing, dignity, and livelihood. "Hello Cyprian. There was a time we highlighted the issue of Eurocraft Agencies Limited manipulating their workers. How is it possible someone is working for Ksh 300 but you are deducted Ksh 2,000 for the same day, yet you communicated to them earlier that you would be unable to come? Salary increment was discussed from the time we exposed them, giving them a period of three months to decide on how much they would increase, but up to now nothing has been done; instead, deductions are now harsh. Your monthly pay is Ksh 10,000, but you are left with Ksh 6,000 in your account because of unnecessary deductions. Before you are employed, you have to go for training and be issued certificates free of charge, but in this case, we are not issued those certificates, and if you demand one, you will have to pay for it. Then, when you want to progress to a different company, you are required to provide a recommendation letter from them, which they will refuse to give. On the issue of leave allowance, you are supposed to be entitled to 21 working days of leave, but here you are forced to work for at least three years before being given those 21 days. Backups are meant to boost your income, but for them, they do not care; yet you are forced to remain for such backups, only to be paid Ksh 30 for all those hours with no transport, yet those hours’ bus fares may cost at least Ksh 100, so we are working on a negative budget. If you refuse to do those backups, you are issued warning letters and deducted Ksh 2,000 for the same. Now leaders are forcing female workers to be their sex workers, and if they refuse, they are suspended and their work passes taken from them. They keep on saying there is nowhere else we will get them. Please help expose this company so they may be assisted in some way. Hide my identity."

Mbagathi Hospital has been dealt a major blow after the High Court ordered it to resume treatment of prisoners despite a long-running debt dispute. The hospital had suspended medical services for inmates referred by the Kenya Prisons Service (KPS) over an outstanding debt of more than Ksh12 million. The ruling, however, forces the facility to continue offering services it says it cannot sustain, exposing deep cracks in Kenya’s healthcare funding and accountability. Mbagathi Hospital Debt Ruling Raises Human Rights Questions On Monday, September 8, Justice Bahati Mwamuye issued conservatory orders compelling Mbagathi Hospital to immediately resume treatment of inmates. The judge warned that the suspension of care risked violating human rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

Citing Article 43(1), Justice Mwamuye stressed that every person, including those in custody, has the right to the highest attainable standard of health. He further pointed to Article 51(1), which ensures that prisoners retain fundamental rights except those expressly limited by law.

“Having briefly heard Counsel in this matter, and mindful of the provisions of Article 51(1) and 43(1) of the Constitution, this Court is satisfied that there is a significant potential threat of violation or continued violation of the Constitution so as to warrant interim intervention by this Court,” the judge ruled.

The decision temporarily shields inmates from being denied healthcare, but it throws Mbagathi Hospital deeper into a financial storm. Mbagathi Hospital debt dispute and the unpaid millions Mbagathi Hospital suspended services to inmates in August after debts ballooned to over Ksh12 million. The arrears, dating back to 2018, left the facility struggling to sustain operations.

According to hospital records, the State had only paid Ksh6.7 million out of the total debt, leaving more than half unsettled. On August 4, the hospital issued a formal notice to KPS, declaring that it would suspend services until the bill was cleared.

The suspension triggered a crisis within prisons where sick inmates faced uncertainty over access to healthcare. Human rights groups raised alarms, warning that denying prisoners medical care was unconstitutional and inhumane.

The court’s ruling now forces Mbagathi Hospital to continue receiving, admitting, and treating prisoners, regardless of whether their conditions are urgent. But the hospital insists that without payment, its ability to provide services remains at risk. Government ordered to act on Mbagathi Hospital debt While protecting inmates, the High Court shifted pressure onto the State Department for Correctional Services. Justice Mwamuye directed the department to make a substantial payment toward the debt within 14 days.

The ruling requires a minimum payment of Ksh10 million to be remitted immediately. Further, the department’s Principal Secretary must file a sworn affidavit by September 26 confirming that the payment has been made.

The case will return to court on October 7 for mention, where compliance and next steps will be determined. The conservatory orders remain in effect until October 8, 2025.

The court’s decision highlights a deeper failure by government agencies to meet their obligations. For years, public hospitals have been crippled by delayed payments from government departments, forcing many to cut back on services. In this case, the standoff between Mbagathi Hospital and KPS has exposed inmates to severe risk and placed hospital operations under intense strain. What the ruling means for health and accountability This ruling is more than a temporary reprieve for inmates. It underscores how government negligence undermines public healthcare institutions. By ordering Mbagathi Hospital to treat prisoners despite unpaid bills, the court recognized the primacy of human rights. But it also laid bare the dysfunction in public financing.

Hospitals cannot run on promises, yet prisoners cannot be denied care. The burden of debt continues to grow, and unless the government honors its obligations, healthcare facilities will remain trapped in a vicious cycle of service delivery under strain.

The Mbagathi Hospital debt dispute has now become a test case for both accountability and the protection of rights. Whether the State pays up in time will determine not just the future of inmate healthcare but also the credibility of government commitment to constitutional guarantees.

The Social Health Authority (SHA) this week suspended 45 health facilities across Kenya as part of an ongoing nationwide crackdown on fraud in the healthcare sector. The suspended facilities, located in counties including Mandera, Kisumu, Garissa, Homa Bay, Kisii, and Nairobi, will not be eligible to receive payments from the Social Health Insurance Fund during the suspension period. Ongoing anti-fraud drive by SHA targets dozens of hospitals and clinics involved in inflated billing.

The move follows reports of falsified claims and inflated billing, prompting the Ministry of Health to intensify oversight of the SHA. Health Cabinet Secretary Aden Duale has warned that hospitals, patients, doctors, and any other parties involved in fraudulent activities will face the full force of the law.

This latest suspension brings the total number of facilities flagged for suspected fraud to 85, following previous actions earlier this month. The SHA said the affected facilities are accused of inflating bills or falsifying services to claim higher payments.

The crackdown forms part of the broader Taifa Care programme, described by the Ministry as an “uncompromising stance against fraud” aimed at protecting public healthcare funds and improving accountability.

Audits and reports have previously raised concerns over SHA’s governance, procurement practices, and financial management. Former Chief Justice David Maraga and labor leaders, including COTU Secretary General Francis Atwoli, have called for further investigations into SHA to ensure public funds are protected and healthcare services are not disrupted.

The Ministry of Health and SHA officials say the anti-fraud measures are ongoing, with further audits and potential suspensions expected in the coming weeks.

Below is the full list of the 45 health facilities suspended this week, including their counties and registration numbers. (1) Aasif Medical And Health Service Limited – Mandera – 023958 (2) Abakore Nursing Home Ltd – Wajir – 000607 (3) Abala Healthcare Limited – Kisumu – 019469 (4) Akemo Valley Maternity And Nursing Home – Narok – 000161 (5) Alasland Hospital Ltd – Turkana – 023956 (6) Al-Baitul Tiiba Hospital – Garissa – 019465 (7) Artan Medical Centre – Wajir – 024218 (8) Aspro Medecol Solutions – Kakamega – 018268 (9) Ayale Medicare And Nursing Home – Mandera – 019004 (10) Chala Health Services Ltd – Homa Bay – 018803 (11) Chemwaa Health Centre – Bungoma – GK-020704 (12) Dawafront Pharmacy & Clinic – Kisumu – 008097 (13) Desertview Healthcare Services – Mandera – 021282 (14) Equity Afia-Homa Bay – Homa Bay – 020857 (15) Equity Afia-Mandera – Mandera – 019634 (16) Filyne Chima Hospital Ltd – Kisii – 014036 (17) Garissa Doctors Clinic – Garissa – 005863 (18) Gopima Medical Centre Ltd – Kisii – 014039 (19) Grassroot Community Healthcare Ltd – Bungoma – 018117 (20) Guardian Hospital – Meru – 019050 (21) Kal Health Nursing Home – Mandera – 024063 (22) Kimathi Medical Services Karaba – Kirinyaga – 017756 (23) Lenmek Healthcare Annex Magenche – Kisii – 015552 (24) Lenmek Hospital Limited – Kisii – 004170 (25) Lifenest Community Medical Centre – Homa Bay – 020850 (26) Lumola Medical Clinic – Busia – 015554 (27) Mama Ebla Nursing Home Ltd – Mandera – 023587 (28) Meswo Medical Services – Nandi – 006324 (29) Namanga Nursing Home – Kajiado – 019517 (30) Nelepek Medical Care Centre – Homa Bay – 018791 (31) Neocare Memorial Hospital – Migori – 006651 (32) New Hope Nursing Home – Kisii – 015430 (33) Northgate Hospital Ltd – Garissa – 005800 (34) Novic Medical Centre – Nairobi – 016343 (35) Nyabondo Centre For The Disabled (Fbo) – Kisumu – 000186 (36) Nyanchwa Adventist Mission Hospital – Kisii – 003660 (37) Okitta Nursing – Homa Bay – 000088 (38) Palmcare Sinai Hospital – Uasin Gishu – 017004 (39) Rachuonyo East Sub-County Hospital – Homa Bay – GK-013923 (40) Sanaag Medical Centre – Mandera – 023553 (41) Tabsam Medical Centre – Mandera – 014350 (42) The Tranquil Hospital – Kakamega – 018842 (43) Wante Nursing Home – Mandera – 014043 (44) Westlife Hospital Ltd – Kisii – 014433 (45) Zonal Annexe & Maternity – Mandera – 003146

Hydroponic farming in Kenya is quickly gaining attention among farmers and agripreneurs. This modern farming system involves growing plants without soil, using water mixed with nutrients to nourish crops. Although the idea is still relatively new in Kenya, it has been successfully practiced in other parts of the world for many years. Kenyan farmers are now slowly embracing it because it allows faster growth, reduces the risk of soil-borne diseases, and ensures reliable food production. With the right setup, hydroponics can transform farming in the country. Hydroponic farming in Kenya is a promising solution for future food security. With the right equipment, such as water tanks, pumps, and lighting, farmers can enjoy higher yields and better profits. [Photo: Courtesy] Hydroponic Farming in Kenya Hydroponic farming in Kenya works by eliminating soil from the growing process and instead using nutrient-rich water. Plants absorb essential minerals directly from the solution, which helps them grow faster and healthier compared to traditional soil farming.

Studies show crops can grow up to 25% faster under hydroponics. For example, a crop that usually takes 21 days in soil may take just six days to mature in a hydroponic system.

This makes hydroponics a highly efficient solution for farmers dealing with limited land or those farming in urban areas. It also ensures consistent harvests throughout the year, regardless of weather or season. Different Types of Hydroponic Systems There are several types of hydroponic systems that farmers in Kenya can choose from depending on their budget and farming goals. Deep water culture – Plants grow with their roots suspended in nutrient-rich water. Wick systems – A simple method where nutrients are delivered to the plants through a wick. Nutrient film technique – A thin film of water continuously flows over plant roots. Aeroponics – Roots are suspended in the air and misted with nutrients. Ebb and flow – Roots are flooded with nutrients and then drained in cycles. Drip system – Nutrients are delivered drop by drop directly to each plant. These systems vary in complexity, cost, and water usage, but all aim to provide crops with the right nutrients efficiently. Best Crops for Hydroponic Farming in Kenya While almost any crop can grow under hydroponics, some plants thrive exceptionally well. Farmers practicing hydroponic farming in Kenya often start with: Lettuce Kale Spinach Fodder Cucumber Onions Coriander Cilantro Basil These crops mature quickly, have high demand in the market, and ensure good returns for farmers. Benefits of Hydroponic Farming In Kenya Hydroponic farming in Kenya offers several advantages that make it attractive to modern farmers.

First, it saves space and resources. Unlike traditional farming, hydroponics uses less water and allows vertical or compact setups, which is perfect for urban farming.

Second, it promotes faster growth. Plants grown under hydroponics mature faster, are stronger, and have higher nutritional value. Farmers also enjoy continuous harvests because crops can be grown throughout the year without depending on seasons.

Third, hydroponics reduces pests and diseases. Since the crops are grown without soil, there is no risk of soil-borne diseases. Managing pests is also easier because of the controlled environment. Finally, it is cost-effective in the long run. Farmers require less labour, and they have full control of the nutrients supplied to plants. This ensures healthier produce and a consistent supply of food for both family and commercial use.

The United States has suspended the license for Ixchiq, a vaccine developed to fight the chikungunya virus, after new cases of severe side effects were reported. Valneva, the French company behind the vaccine, said the FDA made the decision last Friday. The move followed four fresh cases of adverse reactions. Three of the patients were between 70 and 82 years old. An 82-year-old was hospitalized for two days but was later discharged. The fourth case involved a 55-year-old. Chikungunya disease is caused by the bite of a specific mosquito. Ixchiq is one of only two vaccines approved by the FDA to protect against chikungunya. The disease spreads through mosquito bites and is common in tropical and subtropical regions. In recent years, however, the virus has spread worldwide. Valneva received US approval for Ixchiq in 2023. But health regulators in the US and Europe began reviewing safety concerns earlier this year, especially for older people. Despite the US chikungunya vaccine suspension, Valneva insists it remains committed to global access. Chief Executive Thomas Lingelbach said the company will continue to supply Ixchiq to countries where it is licensed. He added that the firm will also work with partners to ensure low- and middle-income countries can access the vaccine during outbreaks. The company said it is still calculating the financial impact of the suspension. Ixchiq brought in €7.5 million ($8.8 million) in sales during the first half of 2025. However, the news caused Valneva’s shares to fall by more than 26% on the Paris stock exchange. Valneva explained that the reported side effects were consistent with those already observed in trials and post-marketing studies. Elderly patients remain the most vulnerable. Chikungunya causes fever, joint pain, muscle aches, headaches, nausea, fatigue, and skin rashes. While it rarely causes death, the virus can be especially dangerous for babies and the elderly. Experts warn it could become a future pandemic as climate change expands mosquito habitats. In July, the World Health Organization warned of a potential large-scale outbreak, noting similarities to the 2004 Indian Ocean epidemic that infected nearly half a million people. Europe has already recorded 27 outbreaks this year, the highest number ever. Kenya has also reported cases. The Kenya Medical Research Institute confirmed 25 positive cases in Mombasa County out of 45 suspected infections. Valneva said it will continue to investigate the new cases and cooperate with health authorities. The company stressed that safety and global vaccine access remain its top priorities.

Prisoners in Kenya are staring at a healthcare crisis after Mbagathi Hospital cut off medical services to the Kenya Prisons Service (KPS). The facility suspended all referrals of inmates due to an unpaid bill of over Ksh12 million. The notice, issued in early August, has left prisoners with chronic illnesses in a dangerous situation, exposing a bigger problem of financial mismanagement in state institutions. This is not just about one unpaid bill; it is about corruption, government negligence, and prisoners’ right to basic healthcare. The suspension of medical services at Mbagathi Hospital is more than a debt dispute. It is a reflection of systemic corruption, weak accountability, and misplaced priorities within the Kenya Prisons Service. [Photo: Courtesy] Mbagathi Hospital Debt Crisis Denies Prisoners Medical Care Mbagathi Hospital is one of the few public facilities that inmates from across the city rely on for specialized care. However, since 2018, the hospital has been offering medical services to prisoners without full compensation from KPS. Out of the arrears, only Ksh6.7 million has been paid, leaving a massive outstanding balance of more than Ksh12 million.

In a notice to the prisons service dated August 4, the hospital declared it would no longer treat inmates until the money was fully paid. Hospital management argued that continuing to provide services without payment had become impossible. Essential medications and supplies were already running short, making it unsustainable to keep treating prisoners without settlement of the debt.

The suspension has left prison authorities scrambling for alternative healthcare providers. Yet, most public hospitals are already stretched, and private facilities are costly. Prisoners with chronic illnesses, infectious diseases, or urgent medical needs are now caught in limbo. Kenya Prisons and a Trail of Mismanagement This standoff between Mbagathi Hospital and KPS is not just about money. It exposes a deeper problem within the prisons system. The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) recently flagged the Kenya Prisons Service for systematic corruption.

The report revealed that funds collected from inmates often disappeared without trace once prisoners were released. Families who sent money for basic needs sometimes found it never reached their loved ones. Such practices have left questions about whether the KPS can honestly claim it cannot afford to clear its medical debt.

It is not the first time state institutions have been caught in financial mismanagement. In 2024, Treasury data showed that 28 state-owned enterprises defaulted on loans worth Ksh266.5 billion. The government had to take on the burden, further straining taxpayers.

Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi announced earlier this year that parastatals with huge pending bills would no longer be allowed to access new loans. This directive was meant to stop reckless borrowing, but cases like the KPS show that mismanagement continues to choke service delivery. Human Rights Concerns Over Prisoners’ Healthcare The biggest victims of this standoff are not government officials but prisoners who depend on medical treatment to survive. Inmates with conditions such as tuberculosis, diabetes, and hypertension require regular care. Cutting them off from Mbagathi Hospital means their health is at serious risk.

This raises questions about Kenya’s commitment to upholding the rights of prisoners. The constitution guarantees the right to healthcare for every citizen, including those behind bars. Yet, financial mismanagement and unpaid bills have now stripped prisoners of this basic right.

Civil society groups argue that denying inmates medical treatment is a violation of human rights. The Kenya Prisons Service has a legal obligation to ensure the welfare of those in custody, regardless of financial disputes. Allowing debts and corruption to get in the way of healthcare exposes prisoners to unnecessary suffering and even death. Conclusion The suspension of medical services at Mbagathi Hospital is more than a debt dispute. It is a reflection of systemic corruption, weak accountability, and misplaced priorities within the Kenya Prisons Service.

Prisoners are paying the highest price for failures they did not cause. While officials drag their feet over payments, inmates continue to suffer without access to critical healthcare.

The government must urgently address this crisis by settling the debt and reforming the prisons system to stop misuse of funds. Anything less will be a blatant betrayal of justice and human dignity.