Story navigation Start Story start 1 update
Resolved1 update Updated May 4

Safaricom fails to compensate former employee despite court order

Safaricom has failed to compensate Michael Karanja, against a court order. The Employment and Labour Relations Court, in May ordered the rogue telco to pay Mr Karanja Sh2.4 million for wrongful dismissal five years ago. According to court documents, Mr Karanja, who was a fraud investigations officer, was handed a lette

Sign in to follow Follow this story to get bell alerts when new updates publish.
Share
Latest updates
Alerts and app Choose how this story reaches you.

Follow this story

Sign in once to follow Safaricom fails to compensate former employee despite court order, pin Nyakundi, and come back to the same story as it develops.

Sign in
  1. 1

    Follow thread

    Create or open your account, then follow this thread from the story header.

  2. 2

    Pick alerts

    Choose every update, major updates, daily recap, documents only, or no notifications.

  3. 3

    Pin app

    Install Nyakundi so push alerts reopen this exact story.

  4. 4

    Share link

    Use the parent story link when you want the whole evolution to travel together.

Pin Nyakundi

Install the site as an app so followed-story alerts open straight back into the file.

Where we are so far

If you are joining us

Key points

Live updates

Latest developments

Newest first. Times are shown on every update; older context continues below.

1 update in this file Story overview
Photo
Update link
Nyakundi Report

Safaricom fails to compensate former employee despite court order

Hammer labor law
Hammer labor law

Media in this update

1 item
Hammer labor law

Hammer labor law

Photo

Safaricom has failed to compensate Michael Karanja, against a court order. The Employment and Labour Relations Court, in May ordered the rogue telco to pay Mr Karanja Sh2.4 million for wrongful dismissal five years ago. According to court documents, Mr Karanja, who was a fraud investigations officer, was handed a letter of summary dismissal in May 2017 accused of conflict of interest dealings involving Safaricom M-Pesa agents. “The respondent’s (Safaricom) letter of summary dismissal dated 31 May 2017 states that investigations had established that the claimant failed to follow the M-Pesa agent penalty guidelines in freezing and unfreezing of accounts and assisted a third party in irregular M-Pesa tills, of which he received funds contrary to...

Source: nyakundireportblog Linked source

Visual file

Latest media in this story

Photos and videos from the update stream, linked back to the exact moment they entered the file.