A growing consumer backlash is brewing against AutoExpress, one of the country’s most prominent automotive service brands, after a frustrated customer took to social media to expose what they describe as blatant disregard for customer protection and product accountability.
According to the story, the customer purchased a set of premium Goodyear run-flat tyres from AutoExpress less than a year ago.
Run-flats, which are marketed as high-end, puncture-resistant tyres with reinforced sidewalls, are typically expected to last several years under normal driving conditions.
The customer had previously used a different set of run-flats that lasted over four years, and trusted AutoExpress to deliver similar value and durability, especially given the company’s public-facing campaigns centered around tyre guarantees and service reliability.
However, within less than a year of purchase, the run-flat tyres reportedly began exhibiting signs of premature failure.
Most notably, visible sidewall swelling, which in industry terms is often associated with compromised internal structure or manufacturing defects.
The situation escalated when one of the tyres completely failed to retain air pressure, rendering it unusable and forcing the vehicle owner to return to AutoExpress in search of support and recourse under the implied warranty.
What transpired at the service centre, according to the complaint, was a protracted and disheartening experience.
After being made to wait for an entire day without resolution, the customer was subjected to a sequence of vague explanations and shifting justifications, none of which addressed the core issue.
Despite providing both a physical receipt and digital records confirming the purchase, the customer alleges that AutoExpress staff deflected responsibility and failed to honour any meaningful warranty process.
Instead of initiating a proper quality assessment or offering redress, company representatives allegedly speculated that the damage may have been caused by user negligence.
They floated a number of unsubstantiated theories, including excessive mileage, undetected pothole impact, and even the possibility that a third party had driven the vehicle off-road.
According to the complainant, all these scenarios were not only untrue but also irrelevant, as the car had only been driven within Nairobi and the tyres showed no signs of tread wear or surface damage that would support such claims.
Moreover, when a technical inspection reportedly failed to identify any conclusive evidence of user-related damage and with no punctures or post-puncture driving ever recorded.
AutoExpress still declined to offer a replacement or refund.
Instead, the only compensation offered was a nominal discount of Ksh 2,000 on a new set of tyres, a gesture widely perceived by the customer as dismissive and grossly disproportionate to the Ksh 60,000 already spent on what were expected to be premium, long-lasting products.
What deepened the concern further was the realization that a second set of run-flat tyres (purchased just two months after the original set and also from AutoExpress) may soon present similar issues.
This raises legitimate fears about the broader quality and reliability of the product batches being sold, as well as the robustness of the company’s internal quality controls.
“Hi Nyakundi. I hope you are well. I have a personal matter that I would like Cyprian to highlight if possible. It concerns AutoExpress products. I bought Goodyear run-flat tyres from them barely a year ago. Run-flats are premium and are ideally supposed to be hardy, as they have reinforced sidewalls and are expected to serve for a few years. I had a previous set of run-flats that lasted me over four years, so I believed these would also do the same, especially given the guarantee of purchasing from a renowned brand like AutoExpress. Unfortunately, the current set of tyres is now swollen, and because run-flats cannot be repaired, it means I have lost over sixty thousand shillings in less than a year. I went to AutoExpress earlier this month because one of the tyres had not been taking in pressure for weeks, and they refused to take any responsibility despite me presenting both a physical receipt and in-app receipts. After keeping me waiting for the whole day and giving every possible excuse, they said their insurance does not cover run-flats, and they are still working on how to handle such cases, claiming that people often come to claim after using them beyond the recommended distance following a puncture. They said they would have to consult their supplier and operations team to find a solution. Ironically, AutoExpress’s ongoing marketing campaigns focus heavily on tyre guarantees. They suggested I might have continued driving after a puncture, which I did not, as there was no puncture. They said I might have done high mileage, which is not true, as the tread level is at seven and the car has only been driven within Nairobi. They claimed I might have hit a very large pothole that could have burst normal tyres, which I also did not. They even implied I might have given someone the car and that person drove it off-road, which is not the case either. They ran a test and found no plausible reason to deny me a solution, yet they still did. Instead, the offer they gave me was to buy another set of tyres and get a two thousand shilling discount. They followed up with a call and repeated the same offer. What makes it worse is that my other set of tyres, also from AutoExpress, was bought just two months after the first set, so there is a high likelihood they might develop the same problem soon.”
@safarisoulke Nyinyi hudeal na car dealers wagani legit? I use run flats, been using them for over 4 years now, they are hardy, give you service, no need to carry spares, fewer trips for pressure and just peace of mind. The last set of four I got were from @autoxpresskenya , barely a year in, two of the tyres are defective and there solution is for me to go back to them and buy others because they cover lesser priced tyres and not premium ones. #autoxpresskenya #autoexpress #nairobitiktokers #cartok #kenyantiktok🇰🇪 #tyreskenya #AutoXpress #CarServiceKenya #wheelbalancing #wheelalignment #pirelli #foryou #carpartskenya #carskenya #carcare #buyerbeware #kenyatiktokers ♬ original sound – Safari Soul
To support the complaint, the customer shared a series of documents detailing the AutoExpress transactions, including receipts, service records, and correspondence with the company.
This incident, while troubling on its own, also fits into a broader and growing pattern of consumer frustration with AutoExpress, a company that invests heavily in marketing messages around product quality, performance, and customer satisfaction but is now facing repeated accusations of falling short when those promises are put to the test.
The gap between branding and reality, some consumers argue, is not just disappointing but potentially dangerous, especially when the products in question are essential safety components.
With digital platforms and social media enabling affected customers to speak out more, such cases are unlikely to stay buried.
Consumer rights advocates are now calling for strengthened oversight and regulation of warranty enforcement practices, particularly in high-margin sectors such as automotive accessories and services.
In a market where the price of entry for quality is steep, buyers say it is only fair to expect a level of after-sales support that matches the premium being charged, not vague disclaimers and empty assurances when defects emerge.
As similar experiences surface and public pressure mounts, attention will increasingly turn to how AutoExpress addresses these complaints, not just in isolated instances, but in terms of its systemic approach to customer care, transparency and accountability.
