This archive report was first published on 15 December 2019.
South Sudan's path to peace and unity hangs in the balance as the country grapples with the number of states it should have. The Independent Boundaries Commission (IBC) has released a report that highlights the public's strong support for reverting to the original 10 states, a decision that was made at independence in 2011.
According to the report, out of 2,261 submissions received from the public, 1,583 people expressed their desire to return to the 10 states, citing better governance and resource allocation as key reasons. The report notes that 'with 10 states, increased border tensions between communities and current state governments would not exist. Ten states are more viable and manageable in terms of resource allocation and governance.'
President Salva Kiir's decision to create 32 states in 2015 has been a contentious issue, with the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-in Opposition (SPLM-IO) accusing him of making the decision without public consultation. The SPLM-IO, led by former vice president Riek Machar, argues that the increase in states has divided the country into tribes.
On the other hand, Juba officials have defended their decision, stating that it would be easier to administer the country with 32 states, as systems are already in place. However, the IBC report suggests that this may not be the case, as 163 people supported retention of 32 states, while others suggested alternative numbers of states, including 12, 21, and 28.
As the clock ticks on the formation of the transitional government of national unity, there are fears that the extension could lapse, and the country may be plunged into further chaos. The IBC's report highlights the need for a consensus on the number of states, and the importance of giving adequate independence to local experts in the Commission.
