This archive report was first published on 10 December 2019.
As I watched the vetting of Controller of Budget-designate Dr. Margaret Nyang'ate Nyakang'o last Wednesday, I felt a sense of sadness and anger at the extent of ageism in our society.
Dr. Nyakang'o's nomination was met with hostility from some Members of Parliament, who dwelled on her age as a factor in her suitability for the post.
Despite her impressive credentials, including a doctorate in business administration and a wealth of experience in senior roles, the MPs couldn't resist rubbing in the age factor.
According to Section 27(4) of the Constitution, the State shall not discriminate directly or indirectly against any person on any ground, including age.
However, the bashing of older people has escalated in recent months, with the President facing criticism for 'ignoring' young people in appointments.
It's worth noting that most appointments that have unleashed the worst of ageist diatribe relate to offices that are way above the average youth.
While the United Nations defines youth as persons aged 15 to 24, in Kenya, a youth is between 18 and 35.
Let's face it: a 35-year-old lacks the experience and skills to chair the board of a parastatal.
Appointments should not be so much about age as about qualifications.
Finally, youth is a moving target. Today, we are young, tomorrow we're old.
How will the youth shouting the loudest against the elderly feel in the near future when they face the hostility they are unleashing on older people?
