This archive report was first published on 21 September 2019.
Published on September 21, 2019, the debate on constitutional change in Kenya requires thorough examination to avoid being duped into a contest it scarcely understands.
Two main formations are pushing for law review: Punguza Mizigo and Building Bridges Initiative. While the latter has not published its findings, it is understood to recommend a referendum.
Recently, governors reignited the Ugatuzi Initiative, which aims to increase funding to counties and give more powers to county assemblies. The initiative also seeks to expand the Executive by creating a powerful position of Prime Minister.
The 2010 Constitution was applauded as progressive, comprehensive, and inclusive, dispersing power from the centre to the grassroots. However, there is a constant push to change the laws, and the country needs to engage in serious debate to examine contentious issues.
Kenya risks falling into the 'choice trap' if it is given moot options, leading to a loss-loss outcome. For instance, the proposal to raise the minimum allocation from 15% to 45% may not be as beneficial as it seems, as counties can still receive huge allocations.
Similarly, the proposition on governance lacks solid argument, with the primary goal being to create positions for political players. Kenyans should not be hoodwinked into joining an insincere referendum bandwagon.
