Skip to main content

Opinion | Should the U.S. Expand the Social Safety Net?

N

Nyakundi Report

Newsroom 1 min read

This archive report was first published on 25 September 2021.

On September 25, 2021, a heated debate on the U.S. social safety net emerged, with economist N. Gregory Mankiw advocating against expansion, citing concerns about economic prosperity. However, critics argue that the current system perpetuates gross inequalities in income, wealth, and working conditions.

According to critics, Mankiw's argument is flawed, as he ignores the significant disparities in the U.S. economy. For instance, many policies proposed by the Biden administration aim to increase both equality and efficiency by supporting disadvantaged children and others who are underinvested in by the current economy.

Furthermore, critics argue that Mankiw's comparison of G.D.P. per capita between the U.S. and Europe is incomplete. They suggest using alternative metrics, such as life expectancy, access to education, and healthcare coverage, to provide a more accurate picture of well-being.

One critic, Beverly Isenson, pointed out that European countries recognize the importance of work-life balance and provide workers with a minimum of four weeks of paid vacation time. In contrast, the U.S. lacks such a law, leaving American families with limited time off.

Be the first to react

Support

Support this reporting

M-Pesa support recorded against this story.

Send support →

Stay close

Get the briefing

Major updates by email. No spam.

Get email brief →

Share

Save share card

Download a clean portrait card for sharing.

Save image →