This archive report was first published on 9 August 2020.
On July 6, the President described the pandemic as both a health and economic crisis. This dual perspective is crucial in understanding the impact of the directive on the sale of alcohol in restaurants.
The directive has jeopardized the livelihoods of hundreds of entrepreneurs who have invested in eateries across the country. An army of waitstaff, cleaners, and cooks also rely on these businesses, along with thousands of dependents who depend on their income.
Just a drink accompanying a meal can be the difference between subsistence and destitution for many Kenyans. The government's encouragement of domestic tourism and the opening of skies for international travel could be hindered by the directive, as tourists may opt for destinations that allow them to enjoy a drink with their meal.
On July 27, the President stated that the path chosen in responding to the pandemic is a 'living path' that will be corrected as it unfolds. This approach should be applied to the directive on alcohol, which has consequences that conflict with the President's intentions for the economy.
While the directive to shut bars is understandable, restaurants need not suffer the same fate. The economy can suffer a double loss if restaurants are forced to close due to the directive.
As the President has demonstrated true leadership during this crisis, a reversal of the directive on alcohol in restaurants could be a significant step towards balancing life and livelihood.
Perhaps the responsibility for regulating alcohol consumption in restaurants could be placed on the owners, who could adhere to government Covid-19 protocols and work with the government to find a solution that saves livelihoods in the industry.
