Skip to main content

KPA Tender Dispute: Lawyer Challenges Discriminatory Criteria

N

Nyakundi Report

Newsroom 1 min read

This archive report was first published on 4 July 2020.

On June 9, 2020, the Kenya Ports Authority (KPA) published a tender notice for the prequalification of legal services, sparking a dispute with law firms.

Lawyer Willis Oluga, with over 10 years of experience, filed a petition to stop the tendering process, terming it as discriminative, illegal, and unconstitutional.

Oluga argued that KPA's criteria, which requires category A, B, and C law firms to have at least one partner who is a certified arbitrator for eight, five, and three years respectively, was deliberately imposed to favor established firms.

According to Oluga, this requirement assumes that a firm's ability to handle a legal task depends solely on the experience of its partners, which is not the case.

“It is a well-known fact that several firms have associates with more years of experience than some of the partners in those firms,” Oluga said.

On July 4, 2020, Justice Eric Ogola stopped KPA from recruiting law firms, issuing a conservatory order to restrain the authority from receiving and processing bids and tender documents.

Be the first to react

Support

Support this reporting

M-Pesa support recorded against this story.

Send support →

Stay close

Get the briefing

Major updates by email. No spam.

Get email brief →

Share

Save share card

Download a clean portrait card for sharing.

Save image →