Journalism in the Crosshairs: Olorunyomi Urges Sensitivity in Conflict Reporting

Dapo Olorunyomi, publisher of Premium Times and CEO of the Centre for Journalism Innovation and Development (CJID), urged journalists to adopt conflict-sensitive reporting practices during a training session in Abuja, emphasizing the power of language and context in shaping public perception and preventing escalation of tensions.

N

Nyakundi Report

Newsroom 8 min read

Primary source Premium Times

Dapo Olorunyomi, publisher of Premium Times and CEO of the Centre for Journalism Innovation and Development (CJID), urged journalists to adopt conflict-sensitive reporting practices during a two-day training session in Abuja, emphasizing the power of language and context in shaping public perception and preventing escalation of tensions. The event, organized by Premium Times Academy, brought together journalists from across Nigeria to address the challenges of reporting on the country's persistent conflicts, which have affected all geopolitical regions for over a decade.

Olorunyomi highlighted the critical role of media in conflict dynamics, stating that 'narratives have now become a weapon; the same pen that records testimony can distort it.' He warned that misnaming groups or using imprecise language could exacerbate divisions, leading to 'deaths, displacements, and tearing families apart.' His remarks underscored the need for journalists to approach conflict reporting with 'utmost sensitivity,' ensuring that their work does not inadvertently fuel violence or misinformation.

The training, held at the Premium Times Academy in Abuja, focused on equipping journalists with tools to navigate complex conflicts. Topics included the ethical implications of language, the dangers of ethnic profiling, and the role of media in either mitigating or worsening tensions. Olorunyomi stressed that 'context is essential' in reporting, arguing that providing background information could 'weaken the harm and danger events could lead to.' He cited examples of how careless reporting had historically contributed to communal violence and social fragmentation.

Premium Times Editor-in-Chief Musikilu Mojeed expanded on these themes, emphasizing the media's responsibility to 'foster peace' rather than stoke crises. 'If you stoke a crisis, you might not know how it will end,' he cautioned. Mojeed called for media houses to avoid amplifying hate speech, instead exposing propagandists for who they are while providing context to condemn their claims. He noted that hate speech 'undermines social cohesion, fuels division, and legitimizes extremism,' making it imperative for journalists to distinguish between legitimate criticism and inflammatory rhetoric.

International Centre for Investigative Reporting (ICIR) Executive Director Dayo Aiyetan echoed these concerns, warning against the dangers of ethnic profiling in journalism. 'If an individual commits a crime, is the factor of ethnicity relevant to the report?' he asked, condemning the practice as 'irresponsible journalism.' Aiyetan urged reporters to avoid using identity markers to explain behavior unless backed by evidence, stressing that 'a careless description can travel much farther than the original story.'

The session also addressed the growing threat of AI-generated disinformation, with Silas Jonathan, Research and Digital Investigations Manager at CJID, leading a workshop on verifying social media content. Jonathan emphasized the need for journalists to 'verify the people using AI to mislead the public,' noting that AI accelerates the spread of 'disinformation, lowers the cost of fabrication, and can potentially escalate conflict.' He encouraged reporters to ask: 'What narrative is the content trying to push?' to identify manipulative content.

Olorunyomi's call for precision in language resonated with participants, many of whom cited examples of how misreporting had deepened existing tensions. One journalist from the North-west shared how a local outlet's use of inflammatory terms in covering banditry had led to retaliatory violence. Another from the South-east highlighted how inaccurate portrayals of secessionist movements had alienated communities, reinforcing mistrust in media coverage.

The training coincided with broader concerns about Nigeria's conflict landscape, which includes Boko Haram attacks in the North-east, farmer-herder clashes in the South-west, and militant activities in the South-south. These issues have left millions displaced and strained public services, with some regions facing chronic underreporting due to security risks. Olorunyomi acknowledged that 'reporting in conflict zones is inherently dangerous,' but argued that 'the responsibility to inform the public outweighs the risks.'

Participants also discussed the role of social media in amplifying conflict, with several citing instances where viral posts had incited violence. A panel on 'Social Media and Reprisal Violence' revealed how unverified claims about ethnic groups or political figures could spark communal clashes. One participant noted that 'a single misleading post can ignite a chain reaction, making it crucial for journalists to verify sources before publishing.'

The event concluded with a commitment from attendees to uphold ethical reporting standards. Olorunyomi urged them to 'take ownership of the narratives they push,' warning that 'the pen can be a tool of destruction or a weapon of truth.' He called on media organizations to invest in training programs that prioritize accuracy, context, and cultural sensitivity in conflict reporting.

The training comes amid growing scrutiny of media practices in Nigeria, where misinformation and biased reporting have often exacerbated tensions. A 2023 report by the Nigerian Human Rights Commission found that 'media coverage of conflicts frequently lacks nuance, contributing to public polarization.' Olorunyomi's initiative aligns with efforts by civil society groups to promote responsible journalism as a means of fostering national unity.

Experts have long argued that conflict-sensitive reporting is not just an ethical obligation but a practical necessity. Dr. Adebayo Adeyemi, a media studies professor at the University of Ibadan, stated that 'accurate, context-rich reporting can de-escalate tensions and build trust between communities.' He added that 'journalists must recognize their role as mediators, not mere observers, in conflict zones.'

The Premium Times Academy's training program has been praised for its focus on practical skills, including fact-checking, source verification, and ethical decision-making. A follow-up session is planned for next year, with organizers aiming to expand the initiative to regional media hubs. Olorunyomi emphasized that 'this is not a one-time event but a continuous process of learning and adaptation.'

As Nigeria grapples with persistent conflicts, the need for responsible journalism has never been more urgent. Olorunyomi's warnings serve as a reminder that 'the language we choose and the context we provide can shape the future of our nation.' His message resonated with participants, many of whom left the training vowing to prioritize accuracy and empathy in their reporting.

The training also highlighted the importance of collaboration between media organizations, civil society, and government agencies to create a more informed public. Olorunyomi called for 'a collective effort to ensure that journalism serves as a force for peace rather than a catalyst for division.' He reiterated that 'the media's role in conflict resolution is not just possible but essential.'

Participants were encouraged to apply the principles learned during the training to their work, with a focus on reducing the spread of misinformation and promoting inclusive narratives. Olorunyomi concluded by stating that 'journalism must be a bridge, not a barrier, in times of conflict.' His words left a lasting impression on attendees, who now face the challenge of translating these ideals into everyday reporting practices.

The event underscored the critical role of media in shaping public discourse, particularly in a country where conflicts often intersect with political, economic, and social issues. As Nigeria continues to navigate its complex challenges, the emphasis on conflict-sensitive reporting offers a pathway toward more constructive and responsible journalism.

Olorunyomi's initiative has sparked discussions about the need for similar training programs across the continent. Regional media outlets have expressed interest in adopting similar frameworks, recognizing that 'the lessons from Nigeria's conflicts are relevant to many African nations facing similar challenges.' The Premium Times Academy's efforts are seen as a model for fostering a new generation of journalists committed to ethical and impactful reporting.

The training's impact is expected to ripple beyond the immediate participants, influencing editorial policies and journalistic standards nationwide. Olorunyomi's call for 'precision, context, and compassion' in reporting has set a new benchmark for conflict coverage in Nigeria, with the hope that it will contribute to a more informed and cohesive society.

As the nation moves forward, the emphasis on responsible journalism remains a vital component of national stability. Olorunyomi's warnings and the training's lessons serve as a reminder that 'the power of the press lies not just in what is reported, but in how it is reported.' With continued commitment, Nigerian journalists can play a pivotal role in shaping a more peaceful and informed future.

The Premium Times Academy's training program has been widely recognized for its comprehensive approach to conflict reporting. By equipping journalists with the tools to navigate sensitive issues, the initiative addresses a critical gap in the media landscape. Olorunyomi's leadership in this area has positioned Premium Times as a key player in promoting ethical journalism across Nigeria.

The event also highlighted the importance of ongoing dialogue between journalists, academics, and policymakers. Olorunyomi stressed that 'conflict-sensitive reporting requires a multidisciplinary approach, combining media expertise with social science insights.' This collaborative effort is seen as essential for developing sustainable solutions to the challenges of conflict reporting.

As the training concluded, participants left with a renewed sense of purpose and responsibility. Olorunyomi's message that 'the pen can be a tool of destruction or a weapon of truth' resonated deeply, reinforcing the need for journalists to act as guardians of truth in times of crisis. The event marked a significant step toward a more conscientious and impactful media landscape in Nigeria.

The emphasis on conflict-sensitive reporting reflects a broader shift in media practices, where the focus is increasingly on accountability, accuracy, and social responsibility. Olorunyomi's initiative has set a precedent for other media organizations to follow, demonstrating that responsible journalism is not only possible but necessary for national progress.

The training's success has prompted calls for similar programs in other regions, with stakeholders advocating for a nationwide rollout. Olorunyomi's vision of a media landscape that prioritizes truth and empathy over sensationalism has gained momentum, offering a hopeful outlook for the future of journalism in Nigeria.

In conclusion, the training session in Abuja underscored the critical role of journalists in shaping public discourse and preventing conflict. Olorunyomi's emphasis on language, context, and ethical reporting has provided a framework for responsible journalism, with the potential to make a lasting impact on Nigeria's media environment and societal cohesion.

Next read

Bank of Uganda Links Shilling Depreciation to Middle East Conflict and Coffee Market Volatility

25 September 2026 · 2 min read