This archive report was first published on 1 August 2019.
On July 24, 2019, Justice Mumbi Ngugi made a landmark ruling that has sent shockwaves through the corridors of power in Kenya. In a case involving Samburu Governor Moses Lenolkulal, the judge declared that governors charged with economic crimes should vacate office for the duration of their trial.
Lenolkulal had sought to have his bail terms reviewed after the trial court forbade him from entering his office for the duration of his trial for alleged corruption. However, Justice Ngugi saw through the governor's attempt to abuse the system and declared that section 62(6) of the Anti-corruption and Economic Crimes Act (ACECA) was unconstitutional.
Justice Ngugi's ruling was a significant blow to those who have been using the law to protect themselves from accountability. The judge questioned whether the people of Kenya had intended to pass legislation that would allow state officers to continue enjoying the trappings of office while facing corruption charges.
Justice Ngugi's ruling is part of a growing trend in the Judiciary to take a stand against corruption. In recent months, several high-ranking officials have been charged with corruption, and the Judiciary has been at the forefront of efforts to hold them accountable.
As the fight against corruption continues, it is clear that the Judiciary is playing a crucial role in bringing those responsible to justice. The recent ruling by Justice Mumbi Ngugi is a testament to the Judiciary's commitment to upholding the Constitution and protecting the integrity of public office.
