The 2017 handshake between President Uhuru Kenyatta and Raila Odinga, leader of the ODM, revealed a stark contrast between public posturing and behind-the-scenes diplomacy. While Raila had previously rejected dialogue with Jubilee, secret negotiations led to a peace deal that caught allies and opponents off guard. This development followed post-election violence linked to the 2007 presidential poll, which had already established a pattern of political reconciliation through symbolic gestures.
Historical precedents show handshakes often precede periods of stability. In 2008, Kibaki and Odinga reconciled after 2007's violence, while similar gestures occurred in 1997 and 1992. Analysts note these moments frequently mask unresolved tensions, with the Bridge Building Initiative (BBI) now facing scrutiny over its inclusivity and legitimacy. Critics argue the BBI risks failure without addressing core grievances that have persisted since 2007.
The writer emphasizes the need to revive the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission to address historical injustices, warning that unresolved issues could lead to future conflicts. With 2022 approaching, questions remain about whether political leaders will rely on symbolic gestures rather than systemic reforms. The author, a strategic public communications adviser, highlights the recurring nature of these handshakes as both a solution and a symptom of deeper political instability.
