This archive report was first published on 25 July 2019.
When it comes to candy, we often assume that sugar-free options are a healthier choice. But is that really the case? According to registered dietitian Alyssa Lavy, the answer is no.
Published on July 25, 2019, Lavy explains that while sugar-free candies may not contain the same amount of sugar as their traditional counterparts, they can still be lacking in essential nutrients and loaded with artificial sweeteners, sugar alcohols, and other additives that aren't necessarily better for you.
“Sugar-free candy is still candy,” Lavy says. “It may not pack the same sugar count as the conventionally sweetened alternative, but it’s still lacking in the nutrition department.”
So, what's the difference between sugar-free and regular candy? Lavy explains that sugar-free candies can be sweetened with a variety of sugar alternatives, including artificial sweeteners, sugar alcohols, and food additives. While these substitutes haven't been proven to be any healthier than traditional sugar, some of them have been associated with potentially altering the gut microbiome.
Other sugar stand-ins, sugar alcohols in particular, can cause gas, bloating, and diarrhea in some people, Lavy notes.
Despite the potential drawbacks, Lavy emphasizes that both regular and sugar-free candy can fit into a balanced diet if consumed in moderation. However, it's essential to read the nutrition facts and be aware of what sugar-free candies are packing in terms of calories, saturated fats, and carbs.
“’Sugar-free’ does not necessarily mean ‘carbohydrate-free,’” Lavy says. “Some alternatives to sugar, like sugar alcohols and maltodextrin, are still carbs—and even if they're not completely absorbed by your body, you'll still take in some of them.”
Ultimately, Lavy advises treating sugar-free candy like regular candy and eating it as a treat. By being mindful of the nutrition facts and consuming sugar-free candies in moderation, you can enjoy them without compromising your diet.
