Debate over the two-thirds gender rule has again exposed a sharp divide on how Kenya should address women’s under-representation in leadership.
Supporters of the Bill say it is meant to correct long-standing gender inequality and open space for women to take part in decisions that affect the country. They argue that women understand the problems they face and should be present when solutions are being shaped.
One view in favour of the proposal says Kenya cannot keep sidelining more than half of its population and still expect balanced development. That position frames the Bill as a rights issue rather than a favour to women, pointing to the Constitution’s guarantee of equality.
Advocates also say reserved seats in Parliament would help ensure women are represented even where they are not directly elected.
But the proposal has also drawn resistance from women who say special seats are not the answer. One critic argued that women should compete for positions on the same terms as men instead of asking for seats they have not won through elections.
She said the push for equality should be tested at the ballot box, where women can challenge men and win on merit. The same critic also questioned the cost of adding more nominated leaders at a time when the country is already carrying heavy debt.
Esthermary Githinji of Nakuru echoed that skepticism, saying society has long been male-dominated and that the way forward is to give boys and girls the same opportunities. She said special positions such as women representative seats should be removed if women are truly able to compete equally.
Githinji added that even in national examination results, people should stop treating boys and girls as rivals and instead view them as children who deserve a fair environment.
