This archive report was first published on 11 July 2019.
Published on July 11, 2019, by Luis Franceschi, a renowned author and expert in the field of law and innovation.
As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, it has become increasingly clear that the justice system is in dire need of innovation. The current approach to law practice is archaic and slow, and it is imperative that lawyers adapt to technology to remain relevant.
At the Lawyers Hub in Upper Hill, Nairobi, I had the privilege of witnessing a gathering of young lawyers and entrepreneurs who were engaged in a lively discussion about the future of law practice. The event was a testament to the growing interest in legal innovation and the need for lawyers to think outside the box.
One of the key takeaways from the discussion was the need for lawyers to be more innovative and adaptable in their approach to law practice. This requires a willingness to learn new skills and technologies, as well as a commitment to staying up-to-date with the latest developments in the field.
As I reflect on the current state of the justice system, I am reminded of the words of Morgan Gikonyo, who started Wakili Mkononi and faced opposition from the Law Society. His story serves as a reminder that change is often met with resistance, but it is ultimately necessary for growth and progress.
Today, we have examples of innovation in law, such as BarefootLaw.org, which uses artificial intelligence to provide free legal advice to thousands of people per month. EBay's A.I. dispute resolution centre has also resolved almost 60 million claims in 2018, without the direct involvement of lawyers.
As lawyers, we must be willing to adapt to these changes and embrace innovation in our practice. This requires a willingness to learn new skills and technologies, as well as a commitment to staying up-to-date with the latest developments in the field.
Ultimately, the future of law practice will be shaped by those who are willing to think outside the box and push the boundaries of what is possible. As I said in my speech, 'Change is not easy and rosy; it rubs shoulders the wrong way. Wrestling with regulators is, at best, dangerous. Change is always unpopular with the changed though it may be popular with the changing.'
